Book Title: Multidimensional Application of Anekantavada
Author(s): Sagarmal Jain, Shreeprakash Pandey, Bhagchandra Jain Bhaskar
Publisher: Parshwanath Vidyapith

Previous | Next

Page 215
________________ 152 Multi-dimensional Application of Anekāntavāda object or a problem, which is called 'Dravya' in Jaina parlance, and hence are known as “Dravyārthika Nayas'. When we are aspecting the main substance only from its generic sense, or class view or empirical view, we are committing the mistake' of Naigamābhāsa or Sangrahābhāșa as the case may be. The remaining four Nayas have reference to the standpoints which identify the modes in which the main substance expresses itself. These modes are changing with the change of circumstances, time and place, and are known in Jaina terminology as, 'Paryāya' and hence these four Nayas are called * Paryāyārthika Nayas'. When we emphasise a point to identify a problem or an object, by pointing out only to a particular ‘mode' which a substance is adopting, we are committing a mistake of identifying the said object or problem only from that relevant aspect. These covers the doctrine of relevancy as envisaged by evidence Act that governs the court procedures. The function of every jurisprudence is to identify the real problem so that complete justice can be done between the contesting parties. But this can not be done if we are aspecting the said problem only from a particular view point. The above analysis clarifies our thinking and points out the mistake we are apt to commit if we try to identify the problem from a particular aspect only. It would be beyond the scope of this paper to go into the description and discussion of these classified Nayas, but it would be just sufficient to state that these different classifications of Nayas show how differently the same, object or problem can be aspected by different individual. They further show that each individual aspect is only partially true and since it is only partially true it is not capable of being wholly true, because the reality can be truly comprehended only by one who can see the whole. 3. Jurisprudential utility of Anekānta: Thus the jurisprudential utility of the theory of Nayas, which leads to the theory of 'Anekāntavāda' lies in its analytical approach of studying all available aspects of a problem and the consequential approach of a rational unification of the manifold revealed by this analysis. The task of this rational unification is done by the doctrine of Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552