Book Title: Sambodhi 2006 Vol 30 Author(s): J B Shah, N M Kansara Publisher: L D Indology AhmedabadPage 46
________________ 40 RAMKRISHNA BHATTACHARYA SAMBODHI 1.2 pseudo-Sankara says, “ By svabhāva is meant the power invariably belonging to the material objects, as for instance (the radiation of] heat by fire...By yadrcchā is meant purely fortuitous origin” (p. 43). Sankarānanda (thirteenth century) in his sub-commentary, Dipikā, explains the difference more elaborately: "By svabhāva is meant the inherent nature of the respective material objects, i.e. their unique causal efficacy. For instance, burning in the case of fire and flowing downwards in the case of water....Chance (yadrccha) is a certain power that conveys in the manner of the crow and palm-fruit (as in the fable of the fruit of the palm falling accidentally at the moment of the alighting of a crow]."37 Amalānanda (thirteenth century) in his sub-commentary on the BS, Kalpataru, distinguishes them as follows: "yadrcchā means random occurrence without regard for the law of fixed causation; by contrast svabhāva is that which exists as long as the thing exists, for example, respiration etc. [in the case of living beings]."'38 Sāyaṇa-Mādhava aka Vidyāranya, too, posits svabhāva as opposed to yadrccha and identifies svabhāva with the Cārvāka doctrine (or at least, as forming an integral part of it). He first speaks of the doctrine of accidentalism: nanvadrstāniştau jagadvaicitryam ākasmikaṁ syaditi cet, “If you thus do not allow adrshta, the various phenomena of the world become destitute of any cause." To this a Cārvāka is made to reply: na tadbhadraṁ. svabhāvād eva tadutapatteḥ, “But we cannot accept this objection as valid, since these phenomena can all be produced spontaneously from the inherent nature of things."39 Vācaspatimiśra also mentions svabhāva and yadrcchā separately, although he does not distinguish them in any detail.40 In the VPS, too, Vidyāranya identifies the Cārvāka with the svabhāvavādins: sarvaṁ kāryaṁ svabhāvādevotpadyata iti bārhaspatyo manyate, "the Bārhaspatya thinks that all effects are produced by svabhāva." The Medical Tradition The SS (before the tenth century), śārirasthāna, 1. 11 mentions svabhāva and yadrochā separately as two distinct entities.Page Navigation
1 ... 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256