Book Title: Sambodhi 2006 Vol 30 Author(s): J B Shah, N M Kansara Publisher: L D Indology AhmedabadPage 51
________________ Vol. XXX, 2006 VARIOUS VIEWS ON SVABHĀVA: A CRITICAL SURVEY 45 śarira etc.) from the sentences of the Vedas such as "vijñāna ghana” etc. a number of difficulties will arise. But (ca) the real interpretation of those sentences is this. The reference is obviously to Yājñavalkya's words to Maitreyi in Br. Up. 2. 4. 12 (also 4. 5. 13). Both Jayantabhatta and Sāyaṇa-Mādhava quote and refer to this passage in their exposition of the Cārvāka / Lokāyata view.55 Jayantabhatta in his subsequent refutation explained the passage merely as representing the exponent's view (pūrvapakşavacana).56 To sum up then: because of their pluralistic approach, the Jain philosophers were disinclined to reject any of the jagatkārana-s proposed by others but would oppose every doctrine other than karman, if taken alone, as the sole claimant, for each of them would prove to be inadequate. However, it seems that even the earliest Jain philosophers had no specific idea about the basic doctrine of svabhāva. If we are to go by Haribhadra, Silānka and the like, svabhāva would mean strict causality, whereas Mallavādisūri, Jinabhadragani and Maladhāri Hemacandra take svabhāva to mean just the opposite. Although it is not possible at the present stage of our knowledge to determine the true nature of the doctrine of svabhāva, it is worth noting that the pluralistic approach, peculiar to the Jains, is reflected in their delineations on svabhāva. It is intriguing that the Sv. Up. rejects this syncretic view outright (saṁyoga eşāṁ na ... 1. 2e). Did the author of the Sv. Up. have the Jains in mind, or some other sect or school advocating a similar syncretic view? Miscellaneous Sources The doctrine of svabhāva has been invoked in grammar and astronomy as well. Durgācārya flatly declares that he has not made the rules for words; they are naturally created: na mayaiva niyamaḥ kṣta iti...svabhāvato hi sabdānāṁ kriyājatve'pi sati...sabdaniyamaḥ svabhāvata eva loke.57 Bhāskarācārya has resort to svabhāva in order to justify the immobility of the earth. Similarly Sripati describes the position of the earth in the sky as something without cause (nirhetu) as much as the sun is hot, stone is hard, water is liquid, etc.59 There is an intriguing reference to svabhāva in the Bhāgavata Purāņa, although what exactly is meant by it is difficult to ascertain. All commentatorsPage Navigation
1 ... 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256