Book Title: Halas Sattasai
Author(s): Hermen Tieken
Publisher: Leiden

Previous | Next

Page 46
________________ CHAPTER 4 4.1 The Third South-Indian, Jaina and Vulgata-recensions (introductory) The Third South-Indian recension is known through three MSS (Ma, Ti and Tp), the Jaina-recension through two (Bh and R) and the Vulgata through five (K, V, B, Y and P). Each recension differs from the other two in the order of its Gāthās and in the inclusion or omission of certain Gathās. In all three, however, the order of the Gathās seems random, showing no internal organization. Each recension is furthermore distinguished from the others by a set of specific readings. From a study of these readings and in particular of the innovations, it appears that the text of the Jaina-recension together with that of the Vulgata is characterized by a certain set of innovations against retentions in the Third South-Indian recension (see under a. below); that the text of MS R of : the Jaina-recension together with that of the Vulgata is characterized by another set of innovations against retentions in the text of the Third South-Indian recension together with that of MS Bh of the Jaina-recension (see under b. below); and, finally, that the text of the Vulgata is characterized by yet another set of innovations against retentions in the two other recensions (see under c. below). .. These facts point to the following -- provisional -- conclusions, namely (1) that the Jaina-recension together with the Vulgata derives from the Third South-Indian recension or its source, (2) that R of the Jaina-recension together with the Vulgata derives from Bh or from its source, and (3) that the Vulgata derives from R or from its source. At this point conclusions 2 and 3 should already be modified. Below it will be shown that R contains a contaminated text, combining readings of a MS closely related to Bh with those of a Vulgata MS (4.6). In this paragraph as well as in the following the Jaina-recension and the Vulgata are considered monolithic wholes, with R either included in the former or in the latter. Conclusions 2 and 3 can consequently be telescoped into one, namely that the Vulgata derives from the Jaina-recension or from its source. In the lists given below minor mistakes or spelling variants found

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298