Book Title: Epigraphia Indica Vol 18
Author(s): H Krishna Shastri, Hirananda Shastri
Publisher: Archaeological Survey of India

Previous | Next

Page 162
________________ No. 15. ROCK INSCRIPTION OF SVAMIBHATA FROM DEOGARH. 125 No. 15.-DEOGARH ROCK INSCRIPTION OF SVAMIBHATA. BY DAYA RAM SAHNI, RAI BAHADUR, M.A. The antiquities of Deogarh situated about 22 miles from Lalitpur in the district of Jhansi are described in Dr. Führer's Monumental Antiquities and Inscriptions in the North-Western Provinces and Oudh, pp. 119-121 and 338, Mr. P. C. Mukherjee's Report on the Antiquities in the District of Lalitpur and General Cunningham's Archeological Survey Reports, Vol. X, pp. 100-110. The ancient fort at Deogarh is designated Luachchhagira in the Deogarh pillar inscription of Bhojadēva of Kangaj, Vik. Samvat 9191 while the Deogarh rock inscription of Kirtivarman of the Vik.] year 1154 gives it the name of Kirttigiri." This inscription is engraved on a much-worn rock-cut flight of steps which led down on the south side of the Deogarh Fort to the water of the river Betwă which encloses it on three sides. This flighit of steps is locally known as the Nahar or Når Ghati und possesses as many as eleven niches all contemporaneous with the Ghăț some of which still contain their images. The panel occurring at the top of the Ghät, with which we are here concerned, contains & row of nine seated figures which represent, beginning from the left :-(1) A male figure holding • rind between both hands, probably Virabhadra, (2) Brahmi with three faces, (3) Mähögvari seated on a lion and holding Gapēda in her left hand, (4) Kaumäri on her peacock, (5) Vaishnavi on the Garuda, (6) Varihi, (7) Indrapi, (8) four-armed Chamanda, seated on a human corpse and (ə) two-armed Ganapati. The inscription under description is engraved immediately above this panel of the divine Mothers. The inscribed surface is l' 11' wide and 1' l' in height. The inscription consists of seven lines and is in a fairly good condition of preservation though six letters in the beginning of the first line and a few letters in the beginning of each of lines 5-7 are mutilated. The characters which belong to what Dr. Bähler styles the " soute-angled alphabet” of Northern India, are closely allied to the alphabet in which the Bodh-Gaya inscription of Mahānaman of the Gupta year 2695, the Prasaste of the temple of Lakha Mandal at Mádhá in Jaunsár Bawar Pargana of the Dehra Dun District, the Benares inscription of Pantha and several other documents are written. The striking peculiarities of this alphabet are the highly ornaniental konas and matras and these are fully shared by the epigraph under discussion. Dr. Bübler assigns the Lakha Mapdal prasastad to about the end of the 6th century A.D. In my paper on the Benares inscription of Panths referred to above I assigned that doou ment erroneously to the beginning of the 8th century A.D. In reality it must be as early w the other inscriptions reforred to. This is obvione, besides other considerations, from the ne of the archaic form of y consisting of the loop and two vertical lines. This form of y is also used throughout in the present inscription, and I feel no hesitation in assigning it to the 6th century A.D. The language of the document is Sanskrit and except for the opening words om namah at the beginning of line 1, the inscription is in verse throughout. In the matter of spelling and sandhi, only one or two irregolarities are observable in our inscription. One of these is the use of práptáns-tridata instead of praptans-tridasa in line 5. Similarly although the doubling of consonants in contact with r after vowels is quite regular, the form kkrama gata (1. 4) in the beginning of the third quarter of v. 4 is objectionable, as the consonant k concerned. 1 Epigraphia Indica, Vol. IV, p. 808 seq. • Indian Antiquary, Vol. II, pp. 811 81. and Vol. XVIII, pp. 937 . • Pleet, Gupta Inscriptions, Pl. XLI, A. . Epigraphie Indies, Vol. I, p. 10 seq. . Ibid, Vol. IX, p. 69 and PL, facing p. 80, • Indian Palmography, edited by Dr, Fleet u na Appendis to the Indian Antiguary, Vol. XXXIII, p. 40.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494