Book Title: Indian Antiquary Vol 62
Author(s): Richard Carnac Temple, Charles E A W Oldham, S Krishnaswami Aiyangar, Devadatta Ramkrishna Bhandarka
Publisher: Swati Publications

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 148
________________ 136 THE INDIAN ANTIQUARY [JULY, 1933 Gunaka-Vijayaditya III."19 But the question is if Kókkala I married his daughter with Krona II,20 prior or posterior to the help be rendered to the Rastrakata prince in the South. The former alternative, however, would give us a reason why Kókkala should help Krsna, and facts seem to corroborate it. King Indra III, grandson of Krona II, died in 917-18 A.D., leaving behind two sons who had attained such age as to succeed him on the throne. Supposing Indra III died when about thirty, at the earliest, we get at 887-88 A.D. as the hypothetical date of his birth, at the latest. His father Jagattunga II, who, though he did not reign, may yet be said to have lived for at least some twenty-five years, for he, too, had got two sons in Indra III and Amoghavarga III. Thus Jagattunga may be supposed to have been born sometime in the first half of the seventh decade of the ninth century A.D., if not earlier, and his father, Krena II, had been wedded to the daughter of Kókkala I anterior to that, while the onslaught of Gunaka-Vijayaditya III on MAnyakhêta could not have possibly taken place so early. Kókkala I thus seems to have succoured Krona II as his son-in-law, and this most probably not during the lifetime of Amôghavarga I. From the Bångarh grant of Mahipala I, the 9th of the PAla monarchs, as also some other PÅla inscriptions of Bengal, we know that Rajya pala married the daughter of a certain Tunga of the Rastrakūta family.21 Prof. Kielhorn identified this Tungs with Jagattunga II.22 An inscription found at Bôdh-Gaya "records the dedication of a repository for aromatics and incense, or a well-scented temple (i.e., Gandhaku/t) for the service of Buddha" and "the dedicator was a king named Tunga, grandson of Nanda, & RAhtor prince of the race of Rastrakūta") who once took or held the fort of Manipur................"28 The late Mr. R. D. Banerjee opined that the father-in-law of Rajyapala was this Tunga of Magadha, of the Bodh Gaya inscription. But it does not necessarily follow from the Bodh Gaya inscription that Tunga, grandson of one who was in the possession of Manipura, had been the lord of Magadha. He, as a Buddhist, might well have visited Bodh Gayà in course of a pilgrimage. Granting, however, he had succeeded in carving out a principality of his own in Magadha, it would come to mean that Tunga's usurpation of the Magadhan soil followed either from the hands of the (Gurjara) Pratih&ras or from those of the Palas themselves. But, in any case, he who had tried to make intrusion and establish supremacy in Magadha, could not be friendly with the Palas, and thus no matrimonial alliance was possible between these two houses at that time. Again, the description of Tunga, as it is in the Bangash inscription ("the high (tunga) high-crested (utturiga-mauli) moon of the Rastrakata family (Raptrakuf-anvay= indu) 35 makes it indubious that the father-in-law of Rajyapala, far from being a petty prince, like Tunga of the Bodh-Gay& inscription, did belong to the Imperial Rastrakata family. "Tunga' is a general opithot borne by the Imperial Rastrakūtas, 46 and Krona II was called Subhatunga, with whom Mr. N. N. Vasu identifies the father-in-law of Rajyapala." This appears to be more tonable than Prof. Kielhorn's identification with Jagattunga II, in view of the fact that the latter did not come to the throne at all, while Kroņa II had actually been a contemporary of Rajyapala's father, Narayanapala, whose reign covered the latter half of the ninth century. 10 E.I., VII, 29. 30 1.A., XII, 260, 263. 21 Cf. E.I., XIV, 329, v. 7-8; JASB., LXIX, pt. 1, p. 69 33 JASB., LXI, 80, n. 9. 33 R. L. Mitra, Bodh Gaya, Ch. V, inscription No. 8, p. 194. 34 Bdriglar Itima, vol. I, 2nd ed., p. 216; Mem. A.S.B., vol. V, p. 62. 35 JASB., LXI, 80. 28 Cr. tho Karhad Plates of Kropa III, v. E.I., IV, 287. 37 Variger Jdtiya Itihdsa, Rdjanya Kanda, p. 108.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450