Book Title: Epigraphia Indica Vol 31 Author(s): Hirananda Shastri Publisher: Archaeological Survey of IndiaPage 97
________________ EPIGRAPHIA INDICA (VOL. XXX adhikarana in the inscriptions, was composed of four members, who, besides having charge of departmental duties, worked also in a collective capacity. These members were the leading banker of the town (nagara-śrēshthin), the chief registrar (prathama-kāyastha), and the heads of the associations of artisans (prathama-kulika) and traders (sārthaväha). The prathama-kulika probably supervised affairs relating to industrial arts. The särtha Jāha was concerned apparently with the regulation of trades, and the prathama-kayastha with all registration works regarding disposal of immovable property, births, deaths, foreigners, etc. It is difficult to ascertain exactly in which way the nagara-srështhin was useful to the committee. With his expert knowledge of commodities, his services might have been required in the adhisthän-ūdhikarana for supervision of manufactures and collection of duties. Under the Gupta system, therefore, the departmental functions of the committee for the administration of civil affairs of a city seem to have been arranged as follows: (1) manufactures and collection of duties, (2) industrial arts, (3) trade, and (4) registration. Regarding the functions of the Maurya commission, it is stated that the boards in their collective capacity had charge both of their special departments and also of matters of public interest such as the keeping of public buildings in proper repairs, the regulation of prices, and the care of markets, harbours and temples. The members of the Gupta adhisthan-adhikarana also might have similar departmental and collective functions. At least in the matter of sale and grant of lands it is seen that the committee gave its sanction $8 a collective body. As regards the extent of authority of the adhisthan-ādhikarana, it was confined not merely to the limits of the city, but extenaed also to suburban areas. Thus, in the Paharpur copperplate inscription, a representation is stated to have been laid before the adhisthan-adhikarana for the grant of lands in certain rural areas belonging to the Nägiratta mandala of the Dakshipārba ka cithi. Similar digposals of land are referred to also in the Damodarpur inscriptions. The constitution of a vishay-ādhikarana, meant for the transaction of affairs of a vishaya, seems to have been different from that of the adhisthan-ādhikarana. It had only & senior member veshth-adhikaranika)' at the head, who was sometimes the senior registrar (jyështha-kayastha). As the affairs of this adhikarana were probably less complex, no mention is made of a freshthin, kulika oz sārthavīha as its member. Disposal of village lands was made by this adhikarana evidently with the approval of the head of the district." Details are not available about the constitution of the vithy-adhikarana. Its functions were probably similar to those of the vishay-adhikarana and its jurisdiction was confined to a vithi. Another adhikarana referred to in inscriptions is the ashtakul-ūdhikarana. This has been explained as an officer having supervising authority over eight kulas, the word kula being taken to mean either a family or as much ground as can be ploughed by two ploughs, each drawn by 6 bulls.10 The appointemnt of rural officers each for supervision of eight families or a small area of * Above, Vol. XV, pp. 130 ff. 1 Of. U. N. Ghosal, op. cit., pp. 203 ff. [The board of administration seems to have worked like a Pafchayat, the Nagara krēshthin being its chairman. The Nagar beth (i.e. Nagara fresh thin) heading the Pafichāyat is known from the history of Rajasthen. See Journal of the University of Gauhali, Vol. VI, pp.81 ff.-Ed.) V. A. Smith, loc. cit.; J. W. McCrindle, Ancient India as described by Megasthenes and Arrian, London, 1877, Pp. 88 ff. . Above, Vol. XV, pp. 130 ff. Ibid., Vol. XX, pp. 81 ff. • Ibid., Vol. XV, pp. 130 ff. * Ibid., Vol. XVIII, p. 76. . Ind. Ant., Vol. XXXIX, 1910, pp. 200, 204. But see above, Vol. XXIII, pp. 54-55. 10 Ibid., Vol. XV, p. 137 f... 2.Page Navigation
1 ... 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506