Book Title: Epigraphia Indica Vol 31
Author(s): Hirananda Shastri
Publisher: Archaeological Survey of India

Previous | Next

Page 142
________________ 91 No. 15). PEDDA-DUGAM PLATES OF SATRUDAMANA, YEAR 9 monarchs, Mahārāja Satrudamana acknowledged the supremacy of a Bhattāraka or paramount ruler. The style Bhattāraka-pada-parigrihita applied to a Mahārāja reminds us of similar epithets used in relation to certain feudatories of the Gupta emperors. We also know that, during the fourth and fifth centuries, independent monarchs of South India, including certain performers of the Abvamëdha sacrifice, enjoyed the title Mahārāja and that it was the Gupta emperors who popularised among independent rulers all over North India and partly over South India the imperial titles Paramabhattāraka and Mahārājādkirāja. The feudatories (including those enjoying a semi-independent status) and subordinate allies of the early monarchs of the Gupta family enjoyed the title Mahäräja and were often called Paramabhattāraka-pad-amudhyāta, i.e. meditating on or favoured by the feet of the overlord. The expression pāda-parigrihita also occurs instead of pad-anudhyāla in the same context in epigrapbio records in the description of certain subordinates of the Gupta emperors. It is therefore very probable that the overlord of Mahārāja Satrudamana was a Gupta monarch. It has also to be noticed that we do not know of any other imperial power to which the Mahārāja of Simbapura could have possibly owed allegiance in the age in question while Gupta suzerainty is known to have been acknowledged in the same region by Prithivivigraba-bhattiraka about the middle of the sixth century. The absence of the name of Satrudamana's overlord in the charter under study and its date given in his own regnal reckoning instead of the Gupta era appear, however, to suggest that the king was enjoying a semi-independent status at the time of issuing the grant. The Allahabad pillar inscription of Samudragupta (c. 340-76 A.D.) mentions certain rulers of the Kalinga region, who were defeated by the Gupta monarch but were reinstalled by him in their respective kingdoms. Whether the rulers of that area acknowledged Gupta supremacy as a result of Samudragupta's expedition cannot, however, be determined although that is not improbable. We have also to note that the ruler of Simhapura is not mentioned in the list of kings mentioned in the Allahabad pillar inscription and that the city may have become prominent after the third quarter of the fourth century when the said epigraph was engraved. One of the rulers of the Kalinga region mentioned in the list of Samudragupta's adversaries is Damana of Erandapalla. This king can hardly, be identified with Satrudamana of Simhapura because not only are the names of the rulers but also those of their capitals are different. In any case, the combined testimony of the Pedda-Dugam plates of Satrudamana and the Sumandala plates of the time of Prithivivigraha would point to the hold of the Guptas on parts of the Kalinga country. If the area in question did not come under Gupta influence during the reign of Samudragupta, it may have been subdued by his son Chandragupta II (376-414 A.D.) or grandson Kumāragupta I (414-55 A.D.) as the later members of the Imperial Gupta family do not appear to have been powerful enough to effect the conquest of such a far off tract. But the Mahārājas of the Simhapura region must have thrown off the Gupta yoke considerably before the end of the fifth century not long after Satrudamana's reign. Of the geographical names mentioned in the inscription, the location of Simhapura has been indicated above. Duhāgrāma seems to be no other than modern Pedda-Dugam (literally, 'the bigger Dugam') which is the find-spot of the record. The indentification of the other two villages is uncertain though they appear to have stood in the same neighbourhood. The location of Pattuvagrāma cannot be determined. The Vardhamāns agrahāra is stated to have been situated in Giri-Kalinga which seems to be the name applied to a billy district of Kalinga. In ancient times, usually the Godavari (sometimes even the Krishna) was regarded as the south-western 1 Cf. IHQ, Vol. XXII, pp. 64-65. See Sel. Ins., pp. 283, 285, 310, 324, 328, 338. Above, Vol. XXVIII, pp. 79 ff. Corp. Ins. Ind., Vol. III, pp. 1 ff.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506