Book Title: Tattva Sangraha Vol 1
Author(s): Kamlashila, Ganganatha Jha
Publisher: Oriental Research Institute Vadodra

Previous | Next

Page 376
________________ ON QUALITY AS A CATEGORY. 381 its appearance is dependent upon the absence of several things, the notion of being disjunct", in the case of two rams and such things, must be due to the particular things themselves, irrespectively of the Disjunction' postulated by the other party, just like the notion of being disjunct that appears in relation to two Rams living far apart, or that which appears in relation to the Himalaya and the Vindhya Mountains. Question :-"What is the reason that annuls the conclusion contrary to the Probandum in the above reasonings—which would preclude the presence of the Reason in something where the Probandum is known to be absent ?" Answer: The reason annulling, etc. etc. That is, the fact that the subsistence of one thing in several things cannot be right, has been shown in detail in the Chapter on the Composite Whole', under Text 607 (above): hence it is not set forth here.—(672-674) The author proceeds to set forth objections against the Qualities of * Priority' and 'Posteriority : TEXTS (075-676), THE NAME (AND IDEA) OF PRIORITY' AND 'POSTERIORITY HAVE BEEN ASSUMED AS THE BASIS OF THE NOTIONS OF FORE AND AFT, AS THESE NOTIONS CANNOT BE DETERMINED IN REFERENCE TO Space AND Time.-BUT JUST AS THE BLUE AND OTHER COLOURS, WHICH COME INTO EXISTENCE IN SUCCUSSION (ONE AFTER THE OTHER), COME TO BE SPOKEN OF 'PORE 'AND AFT, WITHOUT REFERENCE TO DISTINCTIONS DUE TO ANY OTHER CONDITIONS,—50 WOULD THE SAID NOTIONS BE IN REGARD TO OTHER THINGS ALSO. (675-676) COMMENTARY. [The position of the Nyaya-vaishesika is as follows]— " That from which arise the notions 'this is beiore and this is after' are the Qualities named Priority' and Posteriority, which are the basis of the said notions of fore' and 'aft respectively.-The term 'adi' is meant to include the idea also of 'fore ' And aft'. The argument may he formulated as follows:The idea of 'fore' and aft' must be based upon something other than the Jar and other things, because it is different in character from the idea of these latter,-like the idea of Pleasure, etc.-For instance, when two objects are standing towards the same direction, there appears the notion this is

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753