Book Title: Tattva Sangraha Vol 1
Author(s): Kamlashila, Ganganatha Jha
Publisher: Oriental Research Institute Vadodra

Previous | Next

Page 638
________________ EXAMINATION OF THE DEFINITION OF " SENSE-PERCEPTION". 643 TEXTS (1280-1281). OF THE PARTICULAR THINGS THERE IS NO OTHER CHARACTERISTIC EXCEPT THAT OF BEING 'PARTICULAR' (OR DISTINCT'); HOW THEN CAN THERE BE ANY APPREHENSION OF THEM WHICH DOES NOT ENVISAGE TRE DISTINCT' FORM! EVEN IF THEIR FORMS ARE ENVISAGED, THEY ARE APPREHENDED ONLY AS DISTINCT FROM OTHER PARTICULARS; SO THAT THEIR PERCEPTION WOULD BE CONCEPTUAL'. - (1280-1283) COMMENTARY There is no Particular' apart from the various Things. If then, the Particular were not envisaged in the apprehension of the Universal, how could the various Things be apprehended ? That is to say, being non-different from the nature of what is not apprehended, the Particulars also would be not-apprehended. If it be held that the various Things are apprehended, then, if these forms are envisaged, -and are apprehended, the Particular also would be apprehended, being, as it is, non different from what has been apprehended. So that, in regard to these varions things, the Cognition that is held to be apprehensive of the Universal turns out to be conceptual.-(1280.1281) Further, it may be that the Universal being non-different from the Particulars, it may not be distinguished' from those ; even so, the Universal would certainly be distinguished' from such featureless non-entities as the 'Hare's Horn'; and it would thus become apprehensible by Conceptual Perception ; and yet it is not so; hence your reason remains Inconclusive, This is what is pointed out in the following TEXTS (1282-1283). THE UNIVERSAL IS COGNISED AS DISTINGUISHED' (DISTINOT) FROM THE featureless THING; HENCE FOR YOU, IT SHOULD BE COGNISABLE BY CONCEPTUAL PERCEPTION.-IF IT BE URGED THAT "THE UNIVERSAL CANNOT BE REGARDED AS distinguished FROM A NON-ENTITY”,-THEN (WE ASK) IS IT OF THE SAME NATURE AS THE NON-ENTITY ? IF NOT, THEN WHY IS IT NOT ADMITTED THAT IT IS DIS TINGUISHED FROM IT -(1282-1283) COMMENTARY. The following might be urged :-"There can be no distinction made between the Universal and the Non-entity; nor can there be any similarity

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753