________________
EXAMINATION OF SAMAVİYA' (INHERRNCE SUBSISTENCE).
465
(c) The doctrine in question goes against the idea of the Eyo, etc. being the cause of Perceptional and other cognitions.
(d) Birth, in the shape of 'Inherence', being eternal, there can be no sequence in the birth of things, which will have to be regarded as simultaneous; this would be an incongruity, and it would also go against the Opponent's own doctrine that "the non-simultaneity of Cognitions is indicative of tbe Mind."
Lastly, the Birth of things being eternal,—the entire world would consist of things which could not benefit, or be benefited by, others; and lience the propounding of the Philosophy would be futile ; and so on and so forth, there would be many incongruities, which would cut off and smash the entire fabric of the Opponent's Philosophy.-(865-866)
End of Chapter XV.
30
