Book Title: Tattva Sangraha Vol 1
Author(s): Kamlashila, Ganganatha Jha
Publisher: Oriental Research Institute Vadodra

Previous | Next

Page 533
________________ 538 TATTVASANGRAHA: CHAPTER XVI. the denotation of the word, then, this would be incompatible with your declaration that 'a word is said to denote something when it is found that it brings about, in its denotation, the exclusion of what is denoted by other words '; as the only meaning that this declaration could have (under the theory that Apoha is not denoted) would be that the non-denotative word denotes something-(which is absurd)". The following Text proceeds to explain that this assertion has been made through ignorance of the meaning of the words (of the Teacher), and to show that there is no incongruity in those words - TEXT (1016). WHEN THE WORD BRINGS ABOUT THE EXCLUSION OF OTHER THINGS, IT IS SAID TO 'denote ITS OWN MEANING'; AND THERE IS NO INCONGRUITY IN THIS.-(1016) COMMENTARY The Specific Individuality also is the word's own meaning ', by implication,-as explained before and when in its own meaning in the shape of the Specific Individuality, the Word brings about produces the ex. elusion of other things '-i.e. the Apoha in the form of Reflection, as excluded (distinguished) from other Reflections, then it is said to denote' it. And there is nothing incongruous in the words of our Teacher.--(1016) The following Texts explain this same declaration of Dirnāga's : TEXTS (1017-1018). The WORD IS SAID TO DENOTE BECAUSE IT PRODUCES A REFLECTION OF THE CONCEPTION OF THE EXTERNAL THING; IT DOES NOT TOUCH THE EXCLUSIVE FACTOR IN THE SHAPE OF THE SPECIFIO INDIVIDUALITY; APART FROM THE SAID PRODUCTION OF THE REFLECTION, THERE IS NO OTHER DENOTATIVE FUNCTION OF THE WORD.--(1017-1018) COMMENTARY. What the revered Teacher means is as follows :-Of the word, there is no function of denoting external things, other than the producing of the Reflection of the Conception apprehending those things; because all entities are devoid of activity. Hence when the word produces the Reflection of the conception tending to the apprehension of the external thing, it is said that it denotes its meaning It does not touch the exclusive factor, in the shape of Specifie Individuality as excluded (distinguished) from like and unlike things, as this would serve no useful purpose.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753