Book Title: Tattva Sangraha Vol 1
Author(s): Kamlashila, Ganganatha Jha
Publisher: Oriental Research Institute Vadodra

Previous | Next

Page 575
________________ 580 TATTVASANGRAHA : CHAPTER XVI. The following Text shows that the Renson just adduced cannot be said to be * not admitted - TEXT (1123). THERE ARE THREE WORDS (DENOTING THE SAME THING) - Tatah (MASCULINE) Tatam' (NEUTER) AND 'Tati' (FEMININE); AND YET ANY ONE THING CANNOT HAVE THREE FORMS; FOR IT IT DID, THEN, ALL COGNITIONS WOULD HAVE TO BE VARIEGATED IN CHARACTER.--(1123) COMMENTARY If Gender really belonged to things, then, on account of the three words- tatah, lalamandra in three gonders, being applicable to the same thing (Bank of rivers); the thing would have three forms; and it is not possible for one and the same thing to have the three forms-Masculines, Neuter and Feminine; if it did, it would cease to be one thing. If, uven in the presence of mutually incompatible properties, thing, were to be one, then the entire universe would become a single thing; and in that case it would all be produced and destroyed at one and the same time. Then again, on accomt of all things being expressed, by either one word or by another, as having the three genders, all cognitions relating to them would have to be variegated in character. (1123) The following might be urged :-"Even though all things may have three genders, yet the cognitions of things would appear exactly as envisaging that form alone which the speaker may desire to speak of ; hence they conld not be of variegated character." The answer to this is as follows: TEXT (1124). IF THEY WERE DEPENDENT UPON THE SPEAKER'S WEIM, THEN THE COGNITIONS WOULD NOT ENVISAGE THB THINGS AT ALL. UNDER THAT WHIM, THE COGNITIONS SHOULD BE OF OND TORM, AND YET THE THING IS NOT OF ONE FORM.-(1124) COMMENTARY 'T/ they, etc.'-.e. if the cognitions were dependent upon the whim. If, through the Speaker's whim, the Cognitions be of one form, then the Cognitions in question could not envisage things of three kinds (ae having three Genders); because no single thing has that (mixed) form; and it would thus be as objectlees as the visual cognition of sound! Tadvashat':-.e. through the speaker's whirn (1124)

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753