________________
110
EPIGRAPHIA INDICA.
[VOL. XXV.
Second Plate; Second Side.
46 utpaḍa Virapandiyan-kōlal nilan-nal-araiye mukkāņi i-nnila[m*] nāl-araiyē mu-kkāņiyun=
47 nikki nikki-ppakkattārum Maravarum parrāy=uļļa nilamum Pirāndıyēriyun-Kaḍukkudiyum1
49 Mer-Pasalaiy-ana Śrīvallabha-cbaturvvedimangalattu-tTiruppa[sa]iainadar devada[na]ñ=
Cheṭṭā-3
49 lēriyun-tirappu-chChondan-embalun-Tattan-embalum Vembōd-e[mbalum] Pappa5) n-embalum Edirilisõlapperayan-embalum-Mer-Pasalaiy-ana Sriva[1*]labha-[chaturvvē]
diman
51 galattu Sri-Vaikunda-Vinnagar-Alvārku-kkārāņmaiy-uṭpada-ddevadāņa irai[yili vēlru
muda
52 1 Velankalun-Kanichchiy-embalun-kudikkāņikku-ttalaimaru vitta nilamum tira[p]pu Panai
53 yaṇēriyun-Kil'-Veliyārrārum
[Mell-Veliyārrürum
Mandaiyar-kulamun-Nel
54 vēliyun-Tannilattaraiyan-embalum Sōmatturum Aravankudiyun-Karu[*]kuļamum E55 nättürun-Taḍāppiraiyun-Käñchirankulamum Merkuḍi-naṭṭu Merkuḍiy-ana Kalijaya56 mangalam padin-munrävadin-edir pattam-anduvarai kuḍipparray vanda nir-nilamun-ka57 ruñche[y] punseyu[m*] nattamum-utpaḍa Virapandiyan-kōlal nilam-irandē nālu
mă i
58 nnilam-iranḍē nālu-māvu[m*] nīkki nikki-ppakkattar parray-ulla nilamum Men-Mērkuḍi59 yum Mañjaļūrus-Korraṇēriyum Uḍaiyar Tiruppuvanam-udaiyar dēvadāna[m*] Mut60 türanaroṭṭaiyum Anpalva[yu]m-ivv-ur[p*]par10-Chundan-embalum Narimanramāņa Va[ra]-11
Third Plate; First Side.
61 gandanallurum
ivv-urppar1-Chilaiyanêriyum-Uriyappiyum Taliy-embalum Ko
62 rranĕriyum Suriyan-embalum Sōmaneriyum tirappu Purapparaļai-nāṭṭu-pPulla-13 63 14neriyum Kannanur-karuñcheypparrir-küṭṭina nilamum Madalaikurichchi-kkaruñchey64 yum Kit-Cheli-ppurkaraiyum Achchankaṭṭirukkai Milaganur-āṇa Irāśēndirasingana65 lūrum ivv-urppal Minneriyum Kannikudiyum Araiyanêriyum Naduvir-Cheli
1 Kakekudi is the reading in A. 8. S. I. The è sign of Me is entered at the end
This is due to the resemblance of du to e sign. of the previous line.
The reading nam Sembānēri given in A. S. 8. I. is hardly possible. At the end of the line, the letter ță is very clear. Owing to scratches over the penultimate f, it seems to have been mistaken for m. As the loops of n are fully developed in this inscription, there is no doubt about the first letter of the next line being le and not ne. I have accordingly taken the word to be Settäleri.
This word has been wrongly read as tiru in 4. S. S. I. Tirappu occurs again in lines 52 and 68 where it has been correctly read.
Here again, we have perayan-e. The engraver appears to have incised the i sign over and erased it.
The last syllable is nai and not nai as given in A. S. 8. 1.
Here the loop for long i is wanting.
For Me the engraver has written pè.
The letter yu of väyum resembles pa. The middle vertical stroke does not seem to have been cut.
10 The reading parttannan-e of A. S. S. I. is not admissible.
11 The last letter ra is missing, the plate being broken at the corner.
13 In place of ppar, the A. S. 8. I. has Madar.
13 Instead of paralai and Pulla, we have Pirasa and Yulla in A. S. 8. I.
group and the group symbol actually resembles yu.
14 The è sign of ne is at the end of the previous line.
The engraver has written ppu as a
