Book Title: Epigraphia Indica Vol 25
Author(s): Sten Konow, F W Thomas
Publisher: Archaeological Survey of India

Previous | Next

Page 179
________________ 150 EPIGRAPHIA INDICA. Mr. C. C. Das Gupta differed from this view and offered the following translation:"And his (Ranabhañja's) ' aupayika', i.e., adopted son is Narendrabhañja, the son of Prithvibhañja, i.e., Ranabbañja adopted as his son Narendrabhañja, the son of Prithvibhañja ".1 In view of the two new Grants, Nos. 4 and 5, the interpretation of MM. H. P. Sastri appears to be preferable. Apart from this there is a further difficulty; for the exact connection of Narendrabhañja with the record is not quite clear. MM. H. P. Sastri says that Prithvibhañja was not a son born in lawful wedlock', but may have been one of the twelve classes of sons allowed by Hindu law', and he suggests that Ranabhañja made the grant on the occasion of the birth of a grandson named Narendrabhañja'. On the other hand Rai Bahadur Hiralal is of opinion that the Khanḍadeuli plate really records a grant of Narendrabhañja and not of his grandfather Ranabhañja. Mr. R. D. Banerji differs from this view and accepts that of MM. H. P. Šāstri. But the fact that the seal of the plate contains the name Narendrabhañja supports the view of Rai Bahadur Hiralal. A further argument may be cited in support of this view. The donee of this grant is the great-grandson of Bhaṭṭaputra Trivikrama. No. 6 records a grant by king Ranabhañja to Bhaṭṭaputra Trivikrama. If these two identical names refer to the same person it is more likely that the donor of No. 2 is a grandson of Rapabbañja rather than Ranabhanja himself. In No. 3 the name of the successor of Kōṭṭabbañja and the father of Rajabhañja who issued the Grant has been read as Ranabhanja both by Mr. Pratapa Chandra Ghosh and by Mr. Nagendra Nath Vasu who edited the plate. This reading has been generally accepted, and it gives us the following genealogy : [VOL. XXV. Kōṭṭabhanja Ranabhanja Rajabbañja This genealogy has been reconciled with that given in Nos. 1 and 2 by supposing that the name of Digbhañja, son of Kōṭṭabhañja and father of Ranabhañja, has been omitted through oversight. Mr. C. C. Das Gupta has justly drawn our attention to the fact that the word 'Ranabhañja' cannot be read on the published facsimile. The first letter is undoubtedly 'ra' but the other letters cannot be clearly read, and in any case there is no na' following ra'. He suggests that this word was misengraved for Digbhañja and constructs the following genealogy from Nos. 1 and 3.5 Kōṭṭabhañja Digbbañja T Ranabhañja 1 Annals, Bh. Or. Res. Ins., Vol. XII, p. 235. Above, Vol. XVIII, p. 293. Op. cit., p. 183. Curiously enough, on the preceding page Mr. Banerji says: "The actual grant was made by Narendrabhañja". Above, Vol. XVIII, p. 293, f. n. 1. Annals, Bh. Or. Res. Ins., Vol. XII, pp. 234-5. Rajabhatja

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448