________________ 159 (46) Sama (p. 285, 1. 19) Not traceable here. (47) Visama (p. 285, 1. 25) Rudrata's Visama of his Atisayaset as well as the seven varieties of this figure belonging to his Vastava set are discussed? (48) Adhika 3 (49) Pratyanika * (50) Militam and (51) Ekavalze are not quite traceable. Probably they were not accepted as distinct figures, yet it is difficult to say anythivg definitely. (52) Smarana p. 286, 1. 1): Bhoja's ill. of this figure is discussed '. (52) Bhrantiman ( P. 286, 1. 1 ). The ill. of Bhranty-anadhyavasaya (inconclusive illusion) % according to Bboja is discussed. He includes Bhrunliman, Bhranti-mala, Bhrantyatisaya, Bhranty-anadhyavasaya under Bhranti. (54) Pratiba (p. 286, 1. 3) 10: Mammata's definition of the second variety of this figure is under discussion 11. His third variety of Pratipa is also discussed 12. (p. 286, 1. 4) Rudrata's definition of Pratipa is discussed 13, (55) Samanya (p. 286, 1. 6): Mammata's definition of the figure is under discussion. 14 1. R. K, L, IX, 45, 2. (ibid) VII. 47, 49, 51 and 54. 3. Adhika is included in Virodha by Hemacandra (vide H, K, S.-P. 377). 4. According to Hemacandra it is nothing but suggested (pratiyamana) Utpreksa (H, K, S.P. 405). Bhoja includes it in Virodha (vide S. K. III. 24.) 5. Milita is included in Atisayokti by Hemacandra (vide H, K, S..--P, 374). Bhoja accepts it as a separate arthalamkara, but includes Tadguna, Atadgana etc. in it. Ekavali is included in Parikara (S, K, IV. 76). Hemacandra includes it in Atisayokti (H. K. S.--P. 371). afagastefatifear fayah JAAT 49: 1 etc. S. K. III. v. 133. The original probably borrows from Bhoja's Vitti: fa una FATOACH 1 (p. 375) 8. farfur g frauta etc. / S. K. III. v. 118 (The reading in Viveka is followed here), Ratnesvaras readings are different from those given in the printed text of S. K. S. K. III. 38. 10. Hemacandra includes Pratipa in Aksepa. 11. K. P. X. 133. cd. 12. The original borrows from K. P.: अनयैव रीत्या यदसामान्यगुणयोगान्नोपमानभावमप्यनभतपूर्वि aru aragarrafa hafa ga19 etc. / (p. 567). 13. R. K. L. VIII. 76. Rudrata is the first to define this figure. The original borrows from Nami-Sadhu: 3 4991a 477, 37ga fa-eta specya aref: 1 offa fa Fat gaga 107 gatria Farrugia I (p. 115). 14. K. P. X. 134. The original borrows from Mammata's vitti: BTTERTAG Tag विवक्षितुं यत् अप्रस्तुतेनार्थेन सम्पृक्तमपरित्यक्तनिजगुणमेव तदेकात्मतया निबध्यते etc. (p. 568).
