Book Title: Indian Antiquary Vol 09
Author(s): Jas Burgess
Publisher: Swati Publications

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 49
________________ FEBRUARY, 1880.) A SILÅRA COPPER PLATE GRANT. 39 origin about 907 A. D." In the light of the information which we now possess, this is not altogether accurate. And, indeed, it is obvious that Colonel Taylor in this passage only refers to one branch of the Silê ra dynasty-the branch to which the various inscriptions found in and about Kolhapur appertain. There are, however, three different branches of that dynasty, disclosed in the various documents at present accessible. These documents were discussed pretty fully by Pandit Bhagvanlal Indraji in a paper in the Four. Bombay Br. R. Asiatic Society (1877), vol. XIII. pp. 1ff. He there distinguishes three dif- ferent branches of this dynasty, which, neverthe- less, appear to have flourished contemporane- ously. The grant before as belongs to the first branch of Pandit Bhagvânlal. And the series of kings, as it appears in this grant, is as follows: 1. Kapardi I. 2. Pulasakti 3. Kapardi II." (Saka 775-799) 4. Vatpuvanna 5. Zanza (Saka 838) 6. Goggi 7. Vajjadadêva 8. Aparajita It will be observed that this coincides with what is deducible from Dr. Bühler's Plate," so far as it goes. The first king of this series-for Jimata v â hana and Jim û taketu cannot be looked upon as historical, would appear to have flourished somewhere about the beginning of the 9th century of the Christian era. The third king Kapardi II. is identified by Pandit Bhagvânal with the "Kapardi... meditating on the feet of Pulasakti," who is mentioned in two of the Kan. hori Inscriptions, and the identification may be accepted without hesitation. It affords & very safe and tangible basis for the chronology of the Silâra dynasty. Pandit Bhagvânlal gives the Saka year 735 as the date of the first Kapardi. That appears to be an inference from the date of the second Kapardi, allow. ing twenty years a-piece to his two predecessors. The inference is not inadmissible, especially having regard to the fact that the Kanheri Inscription of Saka 775 speaks of the already flourishing and victorious reign of Kapardi II. It is not unlikely, indeed, that the reign of Kapardi I. commenced somewhat earlier even than the year 735 of the Saka era. Of the kings who came after Kapardi II. none requires any notice here till we come to Aparajita the son of Vajja da dê va. With regard to him Dr. G. Bühler writes as follows": "It is also probable that a king has been omitted between Aparajita and Vajjada dê va II., or at least the real name of Aparajita has been left out, for the verse in which the names of Kebid dva and Vajja dadê va occur is mutilated." There is no reason, however, to suppose any such omission in our plate as there is in that on ss Ind. Ant. vol. V. p. 276. 56 J. B. B. R. A. 8. vol. XIII. pp. 11, 12.. 57 Ind. Ant. vol. V. p. 277. A remark ought to be made on king Zanza. He appears to be the king mentioned by the Arabian geographer Masu'di as reigning at Saimar in 916 A.D. Masů'di states that there were 10,000 Musalmans in Saimar, and that the kings were under the Balhara, and had the title of Zenbil when he visited the place. (B. de Meynard and P. de Courtille, Les Prairies d'Or, tom. II, pp. 85.97: Reinaud, Menoire sur l'Inde, p. 220.) Dr. DaCunha's identification of Masu'di's "Janja with the SilAra "Sri Chhinnadeva RAJA" (J. B. B. R. 4. S. vol. XII. p. 55) is not correct-on this, if on no other ground, that whereas Janja lived in 916 A.D., "Chhinnaraja" lived in 1027 A.D. I may take this opportunity of stating that I am indebted to Dr. Da Cunha's papers in the J. B. B. R. A. S. for references to some of the authorities relied upon in this paper. Others of the references I obtained from Mr. Nairne's Konkan, from which Dr. DaCunha also seems to have got some of his information. 9. Vajjadadêva II. 10. Arikesari (S. 939) 11. Chhittaraja 12. Nagarjuna 13. Mummoni (Šaka 948) T (Šaka 982) 14. Anantadeva (s. 1016) Aparâditya (Šaka 1109) 53 This name appears in sundry different forms in the various inscriptions which we now possess. In the Plate at Jour. Tit. Soc. of Bombay vol. fil. p. 419, the form is Silahfira. In Dr. Bühler's Plate the form is Silara as well as Silahárs. In Wathen's Plate No. IV. (J. R. A. Soc. vol. IV. p. 981) the forms are Silsydra (qnery whether this is mistake in the engraving or in the decipherment ?) and Silah Ars. In our own plate, it is Śllara and Sildra, (which may be the same); Srilara, which occurs once, is probably a mere slip. See also J. B. B.R.A. 8. vol. I. p. 217; J. R.A.S. vol. II. pp. 38-4, 894 ; vol. IV. p. 110 and note there, and p. 114 where an explanation of the name is suggested. Mr. Nairne always calls the dynasty the Silher dynasty. It may be here added that Dr. DaCunha seems not to be correct in his observations on " the Tagaras, and the Silah Aras" at J. B. B. R. A. S. vol. XII. p. 61, in speaking of the two as distinct and of one as a branch of the other. In truth, Tagars is not the name of a dynasty at all. Prof. H. H. Wilson's remark on this princent J.R.A.S. vol. IV. p. 109, note, is incorrect; of. alao J.R.A.S. (N. S.) vol. IV. p. 85.


Page Navigation
1 ... 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398