Book Title: Indian Antiquary Vol 09 Author(s): Jas Burgess Publisher: Swati PublicationsPage 51
________________ FEBRUARY, 1880.] A SILARA COPPER PLATE GRANT. 41 The next prince in the line is Mummaņi, earliest we have among the grants that record deas he is called in the plate before us. In the An- tails about the period to which they belong. The barnath inscription which records & grant made next prince in our series is Anantapala or by a king of the Silara dynasty the king Anantadêve, the grantor in the plate before us. calls himself Mâm våņi." It is not, I think, The civil strife, which is referred to in the verses a very bold proceeding to identify that Mâm- devoted to him, is one about which no other innåņi with our Mummoņi. The dates are formation is at present accessible, unless, indeed, not against the identification, and perhaps Màm- it was the beginning of that conflict which is v Âņi was the real name of the king, which referred to in a boast made in the grant published was altered for the sake of the metre into the in the Transactions of the Bombay Literary more smooth and euphonious one which we find Society. With reference to that grant, Pandit in the plate before us. If this identification is BhagvânlAl says:-"The Vijayarkade va of correct, Dr. Bühler's suggestion, that the cor this branch is described as having re-established rect name of this prince is Våņi, appears to the sovereignty of the dethroned kings of the be untenable. province of Sthana ka and Goa. This shows There are one or two other points also, of some that he restored the lost power of the two branches importance, which our plate enables us to deter of his dynasty, viz., the first at Țhân , and the mine finally. Pandit Bhagvanlal, in his remarks second at Goa." The original fully bears this on the Ambarnath Inscription, had suggested that out. Vijayarka, however, appears to have Mâm vâņi was probably the son or successor reigned about the Saka year 1065. The oocurof Chhittar å ja. When that suggestion rences, therefore, to which reference is made was made, the materials for deciding the point in our plate cannot have been those in which were very far from being full. Our plate, how-| Vijayarka took part. But it is not imposever, now settles the question, in a way that, sible that, although Ananta pala boasts of equally with Pandit Bhagvånlal's suggestion; having rid the country of his foes, who appear accounts for the facts on which that suggestion to have been some of his own kinsmenwas based. Pardit Bhagvânlal, in the paper dáydda—there may have been a renewal of referred to, argaed from the identity of names the disturbances after the Šaka year 1016, reof one of the officers mentioned in the Ambar- sulting in that misfortune to the Thåņa Silaras náth Inscription and in Dr. Bühler's plate, from which Vijayarka rescued them. But, on that Mâm våņi was probably a son or suc- the other hand, we cannot, in the present state cessor of Chhittarája. A similar argu- of our materials, come to any conclusion on these ment may be used in support of our identifica- questions. n of Mummani and Mâm vâni. For the Of the period between Anantap å la and First Lord of the Treasury, if wo may so call A paradity, the last prince mentioned in him, in M âm và gi’s time-Mahader ayyao our series, we know at present very little. -continues to hold the same office, at the time of Pandit Bhagvânlal in 1877 thought, that the our plate also, a circumstance strongly indicative gap between M 8 m và piraj e and Apark - of a close chronological propinquity between ditya in the genealogy of the first branch, Mam viņi and Anantap ála. It is also | might be accounted for by the destruction of the to be noted here, that the high offices of state, sovereign power above alluded to." We have mentioned in our plate as having been held by seen, however, that the gap is not so large a one Mahadevayya and the others, appear to have been as the Pandit supposed. Our plate brings oor enjoyed by these “southerners" for a very information down to the Saka year 2016. Apaconsiderable period. For we see some ayyas rådity & appears to have reigned in the mentioned as far back as in the grant of Arike. Saka year 1109. How long before that year his Bari in the Asiatic Researches, which is the reign had commenced it is not yet possible to 03 J. B. B. R. A. 8., vol. XII., p. 882. 70 J. B. B. R. 4. 8. vol. XIII. p. 17. Compare also « J. B. B. R. A. 8., vol. XII., extra No., P. 52. extra No. to vol. XII., P. 52 (Dr. Bahler), 65 J. B. B. R. A.S., vol. XII., p. 832. * The suggestion of Prof. Wilson (J. R. 4.8. vol. II. p. 897) 46 J. B. B. R. A.S., vol. XII., p. 880. repeated by Mr. Naime (Konkan p. 7), and by Dr. DaDanha ! As. Res. vol. I. pp. 861, 864, 887. (J. B. B. R. A. 8. vol. XII. p. 64) is now entirely negatived 65 Vol. IJI. p. 490. by the information given by Dr. Böbler. * J. B. B. K. A. 8., vol. XIII., p. 17.Page Navigation
1 ... 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398