Book Title: Indian Antiquary Vol 09 Author(s): Jas Burgess Publisher: Swati PublicationsPage 52
________________ 42 THE INDIAN ANTIQUARY. [FEBRUARY, 1880. say-as both the Parel Inscription and the stone reign of one of these Silaras themselves. There slab inscription already mentioned as being in the are then, it seems to me, three alternative possession of the Bombay Branch of the Royal explanations of these facts :-either there was a Asiatic Society are dated in the same year. Dr. revolution in the kingdom of Sri Sth a na ka Bühler's Account of his Tour in Kasmir affords between the Saka years 1058 and 1066; or the us, however, some further information on this statement in Bhoja d ê va's plate is a mere point. For it appears that a work composed in rhetorical flourish having little or no historical Kasmir between 1135 and 1145 A.D. makes basis; or Aparaditya does not belong to reference to an "ambassador of A paraditya, this branch of the Silara dynasty. The king of the Konkaņa, "*" named Teja kantha, third alternative may, I think, be summarily being then in Kasmir. If so, I think, we may rejected, both on the grounds adduced by safely assume that Aparaditya cannot have con- Pandit Bhagvânlal," and on the grounds of the menced to reign much later than 1135 A.D. or connexion of this Aparaditya with the town of 1057 of the Saka era." And then the hiatus in Thân," and the coincidence of sundry exour Silkra lists appears to be reduced to pressions in Dr. Bübler's plate with expresvery modest dimensions, indeed, viz, scarcely sions in the Parel Inscription and the stone forty years. slab inscription obtained at Thàn A, now in If these arguments and conclusions are correct, the possession of the Bombay Branch of the it is difficult to treat the boast of Vijayarka Royal Asiatic Society. The facts stated by in Dr. Taylor's Inscription as of any greater value Dr. Bühlerts in his account of his Kasmir than a rhetorical flourish. At the best, it can be tour also corroborate that conclusion. The first only a very great exaggeration of a very small alternative also appears to me, I own, upon historical fact. For see how the case stands :--| the facts set forth above, an extremely doubtful According to Dr. Bühler's account, which ap- one. The second alternative appears to be the pears from our present materials to be perfectly feast improbable of the three. It is not necessary correct, A pa råditya must have succeeded to reject the statement in Bhojadeva's grant as to the throne in any case before the Saka year altogether a myth and unhistorical. It is, 1066,** and he appears to have still been on perhaps, only an exaggerated statement out of the throne in the Saka year 1109. Now Gan. compliment to the grantor's line of the succour dar aditya, the immediate predecessor of the afforded by Vijayarka to his brethren at Thâņa Vijayarka who claims to have re-established in some local, possibly dynastic, disturbance, the Than A Silê ras on their throne, cer- such as is referred to in our plate in the verses tainly reigned till the Saka year 1058. The first devoted to Anantapkla. I must add that there document of Vijayarka's reign that is accessi- are two other possibilities not covered by the ble to us is dated in the Saka year 1065." Vijaya alternatives mentioned, viz., that A paraditya therefore cannot have begun to reign much if at all himself may not have had an uninterrupted before Aparaditya. The last date in his reign reign, or that Dr. Bühler's date for the Kasmir that we know of is the Saka year 1073, and the work to which he refers may be erroneous. first in that of his successor Bhojadeva II. is No evidence is available on either point, and we 1101, so that his reign must have closed at must leave both here without further discussion. least eight years prior to that of A parâ ditya. We have now gone through the whole series We have, therefore, this result:--The whole of princes of the Silara dynasty at present period of the reign of this Vijay arka, who known to us. The series appears to be complete claims to have re-established the Thảņa Sila. save for the period intervening between the reign ras, is itself covered, or nearly covered, by the of Ananta pala and A paraditya." If " See J. B. B. R. A. 8. vol. XII. (extra No.) p. 51, 52. " Which is expressly mentioned in the stone slab in. 1 This doubtless makes AparAditya's reign a very long scription referred to. . one-being upwards of 52 years. But there is nothing un- *J. B. B. R. A. S. (Extra No.) vol. XII. pp. 51, 62. likely in one individual prince in a long line reigning more 19 Pandit BhagyAnlal has already adduced reasons for even than 52 years, like George III. of England or Louis supposing this Aparaditya or Apararks to be the same who XIV. of France. has given his name to the well-known commentary on The latest date to which Dr. Bühler attributes the Y&navalkya (J. B. B.RA. 8. vol. XII. p. 835; see, too, KAsmir work alluded to above. Extra No. p. 52). Dr. Bhau hay pointed out that "! See J. B. B. R. A. 8. vol. XIII., p. 16. Aparårka is cited by an author of the beginning of the 10 J. B. B. R. 4. S. vol. XII. p. 335. 18th century (J. B. B. R. 4. 8. vol. IX. p. 161).Page Navigation
1 ... 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398