Book Title: Sambodhi 1975 Vol 04
Author(s): Dalsukh Malvania, H C Bhayani
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad

Previous | Next

Page 278
________________ About a Forgotten Grammarian Dhanapala 05 i-I, rj, din, takş, dhvan, macun, yabh-jabb, lad, vaj, varb-valh (denoting prādhānya), varh-valh (denoting paribbāşaņa etc), śam, śubh, | hudy-hudy-body, sah-suh, kün, vpjt, dr, kẹp, tang, pis, bhũ, vid, snis, and svad. 1.4. Another point of interest is that Dhanapala differs from Panini considerably. His difference from Pā. Dhātupatha is with regards to the meaning of the following roots:Gana-Imri, ghuşir, śubh, Gana-VIII-Vrji, Gana-IX-dr, Gana-X tapu, pat...etc, pad, pis, vid, vaj and svad. He notices the forms of the following roots different from those given by Pāṇini: maci (macun), muta (pudi or pudu), barh-balh in the meaning of prādhanya (varh-valh), śıkļ (sıkr) şņiha (sniha)'.5 Panini does not read lis' alpibhave,' in tudadi class, while Dhanapāla thinks that it should be read there alongwith lis' gatau'. Pāṇini reads 'şah' and 'şuh both in the meaning of cakyartha' (or sakyārtha'), but Dhanapala omits 'şah' and retains only şuh' in this sense He discards chodr' in the sense of 'gati' as read in Dhatupātha. He adda jabb' along with 'yabh' in the sense of smaithu a'..., 1.5. Dhanapala agrees with Maitreyarakṣita, the author of Dhātupradupa in the case of following roots : Ghuşir, din, takş, dhvan, yam (bhvādi), laď, varb-valh, šam, cao sphut-ghat, and pat...etc. 1.6. Dhadapala agrees with Kşırasvāmi so far as the following roots are concerned ita-kita-kați, uțh, rj, ghușir, ds, dhavan, sam, şah-guh, pat etc. and șvad. 1.7, Dhanapāla and Ma. Dba. Vr. agree as rogards the following roots Ita - kila - kați, din, dhyan, yam (bhvadi), lad, s'am, şah - şub and sadlr. 1.8. Dhanapala agrees with Hemacandra in the case of following roots : rj, macun, mut, yabh - jabh, lad, varh-valh (denoting 'prādbänya'), kün, cat - sphut - ghat, pat-etc. and pis. 1.9. Dhanapala agrees with Durga or Daurgas in the case of following roots : takş, yabh, jabb, śubh, prci, vrji and vaj. 1.10. From this comparison it is evident that Dhanapala has deeply studied $. The forms given in the brackets indicate those noticed by Dhanapāla,

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427