Book Title: Indian Antiquary Vol 40 Author(s): Richard Carnac Temple, Devadatta Ramkrishna Bhandarkar Publisher: Swati PublicationsPage 88
________________ 82 THE INDIAN ANTIQUARY [MARCH, 1911. of his inveterate suspiciousness. He never completely trusted anybody, least of all his own sons. He knew what his own conduct to his father had been, and he dreaded that his sons would imitate it; the eldest son died in prison, the second was seven years under surveillance, the fourth rebelled and fled the country, the fifth, the Benjamin of the flock, was accused of a treacherous correspondence and removed from his command. Rival groups of generals were alternately encouraged or depressed ; when the Persians grew too powerful, the Central Asians were received into favour. Then the Persians had their turn. For many years before his death he could not secure prompt and implicit obedience unless he was present himself. By his conquests in the Dakhin he may have earned the coveted title of Ghazi or Champion of the Faith, though his rightto it is doubtful for many of the straighter sect of the Law refused to take part in an unboly war against Mahomedan Bovereigns; in any case, his hold on these southern provinces was very precarious, and his long stay in those regions had decidedly weakened his control over the rest of the empire. He was a fairly good general and of high personal courage ; but his strategy was not always sufficient to meet the conditions of the problem. Towards the end of his career he wasted time, money, and energy in besieging many bill forts, the reduction of wbich did not assist his general plan of operations. His dilatory conduct of the campaign against the Mahrattahs hardened them into a nation of soldiers, and perfected them in a mode of guerrilla warfare, which in less than twenty years reduced the Mughal generals to helpless despair. Considered as an individual, much may be found to praise in Aurangzēb; yet the impression made by his good points is rather one of respect than affection. His life was austere and laborious, he seems never to have indulged in a holiday. Until late in life he was an admirable horseman. Once only is he known to have been blindly in love, in the trae eastern fashion, but the early death of his mistress, the dancing girl Zainābādi Mahal, pat an end to his passion. Her tomb is at Aurangabad. He despised music, painting and poetry, and unlike his magnifient predecessor, he bailt nothing but two or three mosques; and with mock hamility forbade the writing of a history of his reign. His own attire was of the simplest natare, he professed to live on what he earned by copying the Quran ; his speech was gentle and his manner mild. To his immediate body-servants, he was always kind and forgiving. His correspondence, an enormous bulk of which is still extant, bas not yet been properly edited or analysed. Unfortunately, what has come down to us belongs either to the earlier years or to quite the end of his reign; the middle period is not represented. A perasal of a portion of these collections results in lowering ones' estimate of Agrangsēb's capacity and strength of character. There is much cleverness, apt quotation of trite passages, much interlarding of Arabic phrases, a great deal of pungent reproof, generally in an ironical form ; but through it all rano a vein of childishness, want of purpose, and inconsequence, His style and titles in life were Abül Muzaffar, Muhammad Muhi-ud-din, Aurangzēb, Alamgir, Bādshậh, Ghizi ; and after his death he was referred to as "Khnld Makan." He had four wives, Rahmat-un-nisā, known as Nawāb Bãe, mother of Muhammad Sultan, Muhammad Mu'azzam and Badr-an-nisa Begam ; Dilras Bānu Begam, mother of A'zam Shāh and Zinat-unnisa Begam; Aurangabadi Mahal, mother of Mihr-an-nisa; and Bãe Udepuri, mother of Kam Bakhsh. The date of Nawab Bãe's marriage is not recorded, but she was the daughter of Rajah Rajů of Rajaori on the Kashmir border, she died at Dehli in 1102 A. (1690-1). Dilras BānūBegam was a daughter of Shahnawaz Khan, & scion of the Safawi royal house ; her marriage took place on the 23rd Zal Hijjah, 1046 H. (May 19th, 1637), and she died at Aurangabad towards the end of 1067 H. (early in October 1657). Aurangabādi Mahal died in the Dakhin in 1100 H. (1688-9). Bãe Udepuri's origin is not recorded, but the epithet Bão" tends to show that she was not of high family; there is some reason to believe she had been a dancing girl; and one story makes her out to have baen Georgian Christian, formerly in Dära Shukoh's barem. She died at Gwäliyar in June 1707, a few days before Azam Shah was defeated by Muhammad Mu'magam, Shah Alam.Page Navigation
1 ... 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388