Book Title: Sambodhi 2013 Vol 36 Author(s): Jitendra B Shah Publisher: L D Indology AhmedabadPage 59
________________ Vol. XXXVI, 2013 The Philosophy of Ramakrishna Paramahansa 51 In Sāmkhya Philosophy the Purusa is inactive and Prakrti is ever active. While, in Ramakrishna's thoughts, there is no two, but only One, the Ultimate Reality. He accepts the active and passive aspects of the Ultimate Reality. He expresses it in this way: "When the Reality appears as Creator, Preserver and Destroyer, we call It Sakti; when It is inactive, we call It Brahman. But really It is one and the same thing indivisible.” (GSR: 567) Through using the philosophical terms of Sāṁkhya tradition, he explains, "He who is Brahman is the Adyasakti, the Primordial Energy. When inactive He is called Brahman, the Purusa; He is called Sakti, or Prakrti, when engaged in creation, preservation and destruction. There are the two aspects of Reality: Purusa and Prakrti. He who is the Purusa is also Prakrti. Both are the embodiment of Bliss." (GSR: 321) Thus it is seen that the concept of Purusa and Prakrti are different from Samkhya philosophy in Ramakrishna's thinking. In Samkhya the Purusa indicates the self while in Ramakrishna, Purusa is one aspect of the Ultimate Reality. In the same way, in Samkhya, the Prakrti is inert, while in Ramakrishna, Prakrti also is the one aspect of the Ultimate Reality. And that itself becomes the world. As Ramakrishna says, “The Citsakti, Mahāmāyā has become the twenty-four cosmic principles." (GSR: 291) And “It is the Primordial Power that has become the world and all living beings." (GSR: 343) "It is a case of involution and evolution.” (GSR: 320) Ramakrishna : explained the nature of God as the metaphysical ground of the universe. Though the universe exists in and through God, it is not true to say, form the point of view of Ramakrishna, that it has been brought into existence ‘ex nihilo' at a particular time. Like Sāṁkhya Philosophy, Ramakrishna accepts Satkaryavāda and emphasizes the ultimate identity of cause and effect. It follows from this that there is no absolute beginning of anything. What is called creation is really evolution, actualization of the potential. Thus, according to Ramakrishna, the universe is not created but evolved from Mahāmāyā. Thus, Ramakrishna believes in the theory of Satkaryavādā. The theory of Satkaryavāda in Sāmkhya, the evolution is possible through the existence of Prakrti, which is different from Purusa. While in Ramakrishna, the Purusa (Brahman) and Prakrti (It's Śakti) are identical. To explain the process of evolution, Ramakrishna says, “All elements finally merge in akaśa. Again, at the time of creation, ākāśa evolves into mahat and mahat into ahamkāra. In this way the whole world-system is evolved. It is the process of involution and evolution.” (GSR: 395) Thus, according to Ramakrishna, “Kāli is none other than Brahman. Jain Education International For Personal & Private Use Only www.jainelibrary.orgPage Navigation
1 ... 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328