Book Title: Sambodhi 2013 Vol 36 Author(s): Jitendra B Shah Publisher: L D Indology AhmedabadPage 58
________________ 50 Dyuti J. Yajnik SAMBODHI This, however, does not mean that God can do things that are intrinsically contradictory. As Augustine has shown, it is impossible for God to die. McTaggart, has argued that God is not omnipotent, because He cannot put aside the laws of identity, contradiction, and such other necessities of thought and action. (McTaggart J. M. E., 1906: 202) Against such argumentations Pringle Pattison has aptly remarked that "To affirm omnipotence in such a sense is unnecessary. (Pringle-Pattison A. S., 1917: 404) Thus, Ramakrishna would say that inability to perform absurdities does not have any bearing on the positive concept of God's omnipotence. God is omnipotent because He is capable of working out any possibility which is consistent with His nature as God. God as Omnipresent To express the Omnipresence of Reality, Ramakrishna says that everything is in the Reality. “The macrocosm and microcosm rest in the Mother's Womb." And "Whatever is in the microcosm is also in the macrocosm.” (GSR: 106,389) The Reality is all-pervading substance. As he says, “God exists everywhere as All-pervading Consciousness." (GSR: 567) With regard to the attribute of omnipresence, it should be noted that for Ramakrishna God is not omnipresent in the pantheistic sense. That is, God is not omnipresent, in the sense that He is everything or just totality of all things, and nothing more. Thus, though he believes in the all-pervading Reality, Ramakrishna is not the believer of Pantheism. Because, unlike Pantheism Ramakrishna also accepts separately the form of Reality. He does not limit the realm of God only to the Universe but also accepts It as beyond the universe too. Ramakrishna and Sāṁkhya Philosophy Similar to this, to explain the concept of Ultimate Reality Ramakrishna uses the concepts of Purusa and Prakrti which looks like the concepts of Purusa and Praksti of Sāmkhya Philosophy. But here also, he basically differs from the Sāmkhya tradition. He has his own concept of those. According to him the Reality is the one and the only one. According to him, Brahman and Its Primal Energy, both are the two aspects of the same Reality. The same Reality assumes different forms and performs different functions. He says, “Nothing exists except the one. That one is the supreme Brahman. That which is Brahman is also the Primal Energy. Brahman and the Primal Energy at first appears to be two. But after attaining the knowledge of Brahman one does not see the two. Then there is no differentiations, it is One, without a second." (GSR: 242) Jain Education International For Personal & Private Use Only www.jainelibrary.orgPage Navigation
1 ... 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328