Book Title: Epigraphia Indica Vol 22
Author(s): Hirananda Shastri
Publisher: Archaeological Survey of India

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 67
________________ 44 EPIGRAPHIA INDICA [VOL. XXII. to route and many of the cavalry, elephants, chariots and infantry were cut to pieces and the field was made a feasting ground for kites and crows. After the success in this war, the Pandya king is reported to have received a parani, a particular kind of Tamil poem, composed in honour of himself celebrating all his heroic actions. This second war with the Chōla king was no doubt conducted against Rajaraja III, for it seems to have taken place some years after the first war and at a time when Kulottunga III had ceased to rule. The introduction ends saying that the Pandya king, seated along with his queen Ulagamulududaiyal, was crowned in the hall at Mudikonḍaśõlapuram, at all the entrances of which he had ordered golden pillars of victory to be put up.1 A word may now be said about the second war of Maravarman Sundara-Pandya I with the Chōlas. The one permanent theme of the imperial Cholas from the time of Parantaka I down to Rajaraja III was the subjugation of the Pandya country and they had several times defeated the Pandyas in battle. As such, Rajaraja III must have felt keenly the pitiable position of owning the overlordship of, and paying tribute to the Pandya king to which he was reduced by the dar. ing act of Maravarman Sundara-Pandya I committed at the end of the reign of Kulottunga III. The inscription under publication, as we have already noticed, gives clear evidence that he wanted to free himself from this plight by refusing to pay the tribute and by sending a contingent of forces against the Pandya. Tamil inscriptions do not help us much to determine exactly when it was done. But it can be fixed within narrow limits from other sources as we shall see presently. The Hoysala king Narasimha II, who stood in the relation of father-in-law to the Chōla Rajaraja III, is said to have marched on the island of Srirangam in about A.D. 1222 and soon after, i.e., in A.D. 1224 assumed the title 'the establisher of the Chōla country'. This and the other claim of his that he was the thunderbolt in splitting the rock that was the Pandya, shows that he was requisitioned by the Chōla king to help him against his enemy the Pandya king Maravarman Sundara-Pandya I. Our inscription states that the Pandya king waged a deadly war with the Chōla and caused great damage; but the fact that the Hoysala king was able to establish a new capital soon after in the Tamil country on the borders of the Chōla and Pandya territories, i.e., at Kannapur alias Vikramapura, 5 miles from Srirangam, shows that the allied forces of Narasimha II and Rajaraja III gained their object. Thus the second encounter of Maravarman Sundara-Pandya I with the Cholas, which was more in the nature of repulsing an attack made by the latter, might be placed in the period A.D. 1222 to 1224. The earliest inscription that refers to Kannaṇur is dated in Sarvadharin (=A.D. 1228) and it states that Vira-Sömesvara was ruling at the place. But as Narasimha's reign lasted till A.D. 1233, Kannanur should have been made a Hoysala capital during his time and ViraBömēsvara stationed there to guard the Chōla king from being molested. In fact we are given to understand that it was Vira-Sōmesvara that built the new capital in the country which he had conquered by the power of his arm, showing thereby that he took an active part in the war undertaken by his father. Here we may fitly consider one other claim of Narasimha and of his enemy Peruñjinga. While the former calls himself a very Janardana in destroying the demon 1 It must be noted that this portion is found in earlier records immediately after describing the first war with the Chola, where its proper place is, and being almost in the form of introducing the king is bodily removed at the end of all introductions, earlier or later. Above, Vol. VII, p. 162. Ibid., and Bombay Gazetteer, Vol. I, Part II, p. 507. Bombay Gazetteer, Vol. I, Part II, p. 507, "Ibid., p. 508.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408