Book Title: Epigraphia Indica Vol 22
Author(s): Hirananda Shastri
Publisher: Archaeological Survey of India

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 78
________________ No 11.) JAINAD STONE INSCRIPTION OF THE PARAMARA JAGADDEVA. 56 The language is Sanskrit, and the whole insoription with the exception of oṁ namah sūryāya at the beginning is written in prose. There are altogether 28 verses in different metres. As regards orthography the sign for v denotes both v-and b; sometimes dental sibilant is used instead of palatal (e.g., prasasti for prasasti, 1. 10; tāsibhiḥ for rāfibhiḥ, 1. 20; suddho for tuddho, 1. 25). The consonant following the superscript r is doubled, as for example, ravēr=vvārē, bhānurnniratyayam (l. 1), etc. The inscription records that Jagaddēva's father was Udayaditya, and his paternal uncle was the king Bhoja (v. 6). Jagaddēva is stated to have invaded the country of the Andhra king, and inflicted a severe defeat on him (v. 7). He uprooted the king of Chakradurga (v. 8), and slew many soldiers of the king of Malahara at Dorasamudra (v. 9). He also won victory over the Gurjara warriors near the Arbuda mountain (v. 10). He conquered the king Karna (v. 12). Bhöja referred to above was evidently the great king of the same name, who ruled in Mālava from about 1000 to 1055 A.D. The history of Bhoja is well known to us from other sources. The latter part of his reign was unhappy. Shortly before 1055 A.D., the Kalachuri Karna and the Chaulukya Bhima I made an alliance against him, and invaded Mālava from the east and the west. When the battle was progressing, Bhoja suddenly died of a malady, and Mälava was taken possession of by the Kalachuris and the Chaulukyas'. In that difficult period, Jayasimha, the son of Bhöja, sought help from the Chālukya Sõmēsvara I, king of Kalyāņi, and with the aid of the latter's son Vikramaditya (VI) succeeded in regaining his throne by oasting Karna and Bhima from Mālava!. Since that time Jayasimha remained a staunch friend of Vikramaditya, who was under his father, the governor of Banavāsī in the third quarter of the 11th century. Vikramăditya was deputed by his father to protect the interest of his empire in the south. The Eastern Chalukya Rājarija, the king of Vengi, died in 1062 A.D. His son Räjëndra II (later on Kulottunga Chola I) was too young to govern his kingdom. Vikramaditya intended to avail himself of this opportunity of conquering Vengi, and organised a vast army for that purpose. Jayasimha, who was indebted to Vikramaditya for his past services, seems to have joined him in this expedi. tion in order to help his cause. The allied armies advanced towards Vēngi and threatened the Eastern Chalukyas. The young Rajendra could not resist their onslaught, and Vengl fell in the hands of Vikramāditya and Jayasimha. In that predicament Vijayaditya VII, the younger brother of the deceased Rājarāja, took up the cause of his nephew, and appealed to the Chola Virarājēndra (A.D. 1062-1069) for assistance. The Chola king responded to his prayer and marched towards Vēngi at the head of a large army. He confronted his enemfes on the bank of the Kistna near Bezwada (Vijayavādi). In the action that followed the Karnātas and the Paramāras were severely worsted, and the cousin (or younger brother) of Jayasinhha with many other generals lost their lives. Vēngi was reconquered by the Cholas, and Virarājēndra appointed Vijayaditya to rule it on behalf of Rājēndra-Chola.. The Tiruvengadu inscription of the second year of the reign of Virarājēndra tells us that he defeated the army sent into Vengainādu by Vikramāditya. The Karuvür inscription of the fourth year of his reign records that he despatched (the banner of the ferocious tiger into all directions and cut off the beautiful heads surrounded by garlands (won) on battle-fields, of Vāraŋ, of the [Kerala), (who wore) large ankle rings, (and) of the younger brother (or cousin) of Ja(na)nátha of Dhară.' The Manimangalam [See note 5, p. 58.-Ed.) * Merutunga's Prabandha-chintamani, by Tawney, pp. 73-75. * Bilhana's Vikramanka-charita, Sarga III, v. 67. . 8.1. I., Vol. III, p. 193. 5 Ibid. . Ibid., p. 37.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408