Book Title: Epigraphia Indica Vol 22
Author(s): Hirananda Shastri
Publisher: Archaeological Survey of India

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 115
________________ EPIGRAPHIA INDICA. [VOL. XXII. No. 14.- TIRUVALANGADU INSCRIPTION OF RAJADHIRAJA II. BY V. VENKATASUBBA AYYAR, B.A., MADRAS. This inscription is engraved on the east wall of the first prikāre of the Nataraja shrine in the Vatanārāyaņēśvara temple at Tiruvālangādu, a small station near Madras on the Madras and Southern Mahratta Railway. It was copied in 1905, but in that year the inscription could not be copied in full as it was partially obstructed by later structural additions to the temple. In the subsequent renovation, most of the inscribed stones were lost so that only a portion of the record is now preserved in the temple. On account of its deroagad condition, its importance was not sufficiently recognised hitherto, but it now receives elucidation from two insoriptions copied at Pallavarāyanpottai' and Tirumayānam in the Tanjore district. It is of great value since it throws new light on the Chola, Pandya and Singhalese history in the third quarter of the 12th century A.D. It is engraved in the Tamil language and script of the 12th century A.D. and is particularly free from orthographical errors. The record is dated in the 12th year and 17th day of the reign of the Chola ling Rājakõsarivarman alias Rājādhirājadēva (II) and commences with the usual preamble beginning with the words kadal-Sülnda, etc. The object of the inscription is the grant of 10 vēli of land in Rājarājan-Palaiyaņār situated in Nep mahi-näda, a division of Acromoli ]devavaļanādu, free of taxes including antarāyam and pātam, to Vēdav pamudatyān Ammaiappan alias Annan Pallavarājan of Palatyanür, evidently for his services to the State in frustrating the hostile attempts of the Singhalese king Parakramabāhu against the Chala country. This inscription is the only record so far hown that gives a detailed racount of the Singhalese activities in the war of the Pandyan succession, for which our mly source has hitherto been the Singhalese chronicle Mahāvamsa ; but this is biased in its version, especially as it does not give No. 465 of 1905 of the Madras Epigraphical collection. ? In the absence of the original inscribed stones, the impression preserved in the office of the Superinten. lent for Epigraphy, Madras, is the only record now available for this waluable inscription. 3 No. 433 of 1934 of the Madras Epigraphical collection ; vide also above, Vol. XXI, p. 184, where this inscription is published. No. 281 of 1925 of the same collection. This is highly damaged and appears to be a duplicate copy of the present record. As regards the initial date of this king there is some confusion. Prof. Kialhorn had fixed. It between 28th February and 30th March 1163 A.D. But a record from Nandalar (No. 371 of 1907), while giving astronomical details couples the 12th regnal year of the king with the cyclic year Hématamba which corresponded to A.D. 1177 (above, Vol. X, p. 127). In this case the regnal year intended must be 14th expired or 15th current and not 12 as cited in the record. This apparent difference in date is, curiously enough, reiterated in an inscription cently copied in the Chittoor District (No. 209 of 1932), where the 19th regnal year of this king is also stated to be his 14th year. This would suggest that Rajadhiraja II was a crown prince for two years before he became king. There are, however, three inscriptions of this king (Nos. 571 of 1907, 428 of 1912 and 19 of 1913) which point +0 A.D. 1166 as the initial year. From the Pallavarayanpettai inscription we know that Rajadhiraja II was crowned 4 years after his nomination. The initial date of his predecessor, Rajaraja 11, 1a 1146 A.D. and his highest regnal year is 19 (No. 411 of 1909). Rajaraja II must therefore have lived till 1164.85 A.D. The whole position may now be summed up as follows: A.D. 1163 Rajadhiraja's nomination, A.D. 1164-65 Rajarāja's death and Rajadhinaja's succession, A.D. 1166 Rajadhiraja's coronation. Since both A.D. 1163 and 1166 work correctly as the initial year, it will be evident that Rajadhiraja II, in some of his records, counted his reign from the year of his nomination and in others from that of his coronation.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408