Book Title: Epigraphia Indica Vol 22
Author(s): Hirananda Shastri
Publisher: Archaeological Survey of India

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 133
________________ 100 EPIGRAPHIA INDICA. [VOL. XXII. boundaries of the village have been specified. One of the donees was Marachcha, son of Maradi. He was an adhvaryu and a religious student of the Kāņva-śākhā. His native place was Kurugōta, and he pertained to the Salankayana-götra. The other donee was Durgāditya, son of Bhaṭṭa Nārāyaṇa. He also was an adhvaryu, but was a religious student of the Madhyandinaśākhā. His native place was Nandipuradvārī. He was a member of the Community of Brahmans well versed in the four Vedas (chaturvidya-sāmānya) belonging to his place, and pertained to the Jātukarṇya-gōtra. The occasion of the grant was the eclipse of the sun, which occurred in the Saka year 708 expired on the Amavasya day of the dark half of the Asvayuja (Aévina). This corresponds to Wednesday, 27th September, A.D. 786, when there was a solar eclipse. It will be seen that the donor of the grant is a queen. And what is noteworthy about it is that she grants a village and issues the charter without any formal sanction or approval being given by her husband, king Dhruvaraja. This gives rise to an interesting question about the polity of Ancient India. Instances are not unknown of grants being made by queens. We have thus the Naihati Plate of the Sena king Ballalasēna, recording and sanctioning the grant of a village by his mother Vilasadevi on the occasion of a solar eclipse. As Viläsadevi was the wife of Vijayasena who was then dead, one can easily understand why her grant had to be approved and sanctioned by her son Ballalasena who was then the living king. The case was different with Prabhavatigupta who issued the Poona Plates. She was the agramahishi of the Vākāṭaka king Rudrasena I. But when she issued the grant, she was Regent during the minority of her son Divākarasēna. This is, no doubt, an interesting item of information, because it shows that women could administer a kingdom when their sons were minors. But as she was practically the ruler, it is intelligible how she could issue a charter without sanction being accorded to it by an extraneous higher authority. Nevertheless, be it noted, the charter has a seal bearing not her own name, but that of her son, namely, Divakarasēna. Far more interesting perhaps are the grants of Tribhuvana-Mahādēvi and Dandi-Mahādēvi, both of the Kara family of Guhesvarapāṭaka. The first of these was the daughter of Rajamalla, a king of the south, and Queen of Lalitabhāradeva. After the death of her husband, the feudatory chieftains of the kingdom approached her with a request to accept the sovereignty come to her in course of succession, and cited the instance of Devi Gōsvamini who apparently belonged to the same family and who agreed to administer the kingdom under similar circumstances. And in compliance with their request, we are told, she ascended the lion-throne like Katyayani. The name of the other female ruler furnished by this dynasty is that of Daṇḍi-mahādēvi, who was the daughter of the Kara king Subhakara. That both Tribhuvana-mahadevi and Dandi-mahadevi were real rulers is proved by the charters they issued on their sole authority, and, above all, by the titles which they bore, namely, Paramabhaṭṭārikā Mahārājādhirājā Paramēšvari. The only difference between these two is that while Tribhuvana-mahadevi was married into the Kara family, Dandi-mahadevi was apparently a virgin of that family. Whether the latter could have continued to be the ruler if she had been married is a most interesting point of law with which, however, we are not here concerned. Suffice it to say, both of these queens were rulers in reality, and it is therefore no wonder if they could issue grants in their own names, with their own dates and seals and without any extraneous sanction. But what about Sila-mahādēvi, Queen of Dhruvaraja, who is the donor of 1 Above, Vol. XIV, pp. 15vff. Ibid., Vol. XV, pp. 41f. Another grant of Prabhavatigupta is known which she made when she was a hundred years old. Though the village was granted by her, the plates refer themselves to a regnal year of her third son, Pravarasana (D. R. Bhandarkar's List of North. Ind. Insers., No. 1706; J. P. A. 8. B., Vol. XX, pp. 58ff). J. B.O. R. S., Vol. II, pp. 422-23, l. 16-20 Bhandarkar's List Nos. 1413, 1416 and 1906,

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408