Book Title: Sudha Sagar Hindi English Jaina Dictionary
Author(s): Rameshchandra Jain
Publisher: Gyansagar Vagarth Vimarsh Kendra Byavar

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 214
________________ (195) prama nas advanced in this connection. निर्विकल्पक प्रत्यक्ष - Indeterminate sen sory cognition or pure sensation. निर्विकल्पक प्रत्यक्ष के विषय में जैन दृष्टिकोण - According to the Buddhist logicians, only pure sensations which are indeterminate cognition devoid of all thought element whatsoever are of the nature of perception. The Jaina logicians, on the other hand, declare that only determinate, thought-involving cognitions can be of the nature of perception (Pratyak sa Prama na). Logicians following other systems in the main maintain an intermediate position. For them both indeterminate and determinate cognitions could be of the nature of perception ( प्रत्यक्ष प्रमाण) So their task is to counter the Buddhist view by showing that determinate cognitions also could be of the nature of perception. But the task of the Jaina logicians is two-fold. They have to prove on the one hand that indeterminate cognitions can never be counted as perception (प्रत्यक्ष प्रमाण) and on the other that only determinate cognitions can be so counted. Thus like the Nya ya Vaise sikas, they establish the validityof the determinate cognitions generated by sense-object contact, but in addition they prove the invalidity of all indeterminate cognition. In their first task they are naturally assisted by the NyayaVaisesikas and the Mimamskas as this is their common concern. In the second task they are helped by the terms and conditions laid down by the Buddhist logicians themselves in their definition of valid cognition. viz. effi ciency and non-discrepancy. The Jaina logicians too, following in the footsteps of these Buddhist logicians define valid cognition as efficient and non-discrepant. But they rightly observe that indeterminate cognition being never efficient and non-discrepant can never be regarded as valid. सविकल्पक - Determinate. अविभक्तआलोचन - Indeterminate perceptual cognition. U-Immediate cause. बोधाबोध स्वभाव सामग्री - Aggregate of the conditions physical and cognitional. वैशद्य - Vividness. सविकल्पक ज्ञान का प्रामाण्य - Akalan ka seems to have taken great pains to establish the validity (H) of the determinate cognitions generated by sense object contact (This is the direct contrast to Buddhist position). The following are the main reasons adduced by him in this connection. The object of an indeterminate cognition and the corresponding valid determinate cognition is the same. The determinate cognition in question is not contradicted by a subsequent conative activity. It determines what is hitherto undetermined. It may co-exist with the thought or conception (that is, the determinate cognition) of another thing. It has vividness natural to it because it is generated by sense-object contact. Of course, it involves memory images but they are revived and controlled by the concerned sense object contact. There is here no unrestrained flight of imagination. The attention remains centred on the presented object itself. It does not move in the realm of pure idea (that is, idea unconnected with the object presented). The

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404