________________
126
[82. -] DB. JE HET FETT * xxx gay i
पिंगल (तं) तं नारी कंटार इत्तेहो ॥१९ Notes : Nothing can be definitely made out of this passage
except that Here is a corruption of 2003. Daniélou and Bhatt have suggested पिसाइअं नेय as an emendation of पिसु...सव्वेय in the first line. But there is nothing to support this guess. It is more likely that fag... stood for पिसुणो or पिसुणिय. It can be also suggested that second line began with सव्वेय (or सम्वेय); the second line as it is, is short by five Mātrās. There is also nothing to support the word division given by Daniélou and Bhatt with the exception of the word भल्लइ (i.e भण्णइ). The name of the dialect also cannot be made out. It is likely to have been in the lost portion. Or is it given in the beginning ?
[P3.NET
]
DB. F(@esto ga HÀNafi FETET * * xxl
गुज्जीतेलं आट्ठी जहा पुल्ल ॥२० Notes : The name of the dialect is het i.e. Feast. The
first portion is to be read मेच्छीए पुण भणिओ. No Deśya item or its gloss can be identified from the rest. The second line is also metrically defective and it is short by some eight Mātrās.
Jain Education International
For Private & Personal Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org
