Book Title: Indian Antiquary Vol 33
Author(s): Richard Carnac Temple
Publisher: Swati Publications

Previous | Next

Page 129
________________ MAY, 1904.] MUNDAS AND DRAVIDAS. 125 families, that cannot prove much. The same peculiarity is found in many other languages. The forms in actual use among Mund as and Dravidas are, moreover, quite different. Mr. Hahn, it is true, compares Kurukh én, oblique eng with Mundari in, I; Kurukh éku, with Mandari oko, who? He forgets, however, that a comparison of other dialects shows that the Dravidian base of the pronoun "I" is é or né, while the characteristic element of the Munda form is ; the base of the Dravidian interrogative pronoun is ya or é, but the corresponding Mundà form is åka. No sane philologist would, of course, draw any conclusion from the fact that the Munda languages, like the Dravidian ones, have no relative pronoun. The same is the case in so many quite different families of languages that it can almost be represented as the rule, the development of a real relative pronoun being considered as the exception. Verbs. Every traco of analogy between the Mundâ and Dravidian families disappears when we proceed to consider the verbs. Mr. Hahn, it is true, compares quite a series of suffixes in Mun târi and Kurukh. It is not, however, necessary to show in detail all the mistakes he has made in those comparisons. None of them would havo been possible if he had really known Mundari. I shall take two typical examples. The suffix of the present tense in Kurukh is da; thus, én es-da-n, I break. The final n of erda-n is the pronominal suffix of the first person singular. Mr. Hahn, however, does not hesitate to compare dan, the tense suffix plus the personal termination, with the Mundári copula tan, which corresponds to Santali kan, and is used to form a present, not, however, as a tense suffix but as an auxiliary. Mr. Habn further compares what he calls the perfect soffixes Mundari jan-d, Kurukh jan. Maņdari jan-d contains the tense suffix jan and the so-called categoricnl a. We need only consider the former. Jan corresponds to Santali en and is the suffix of the simple past passive. The final - is kept through all persons and numbers. Kurukh jan is the suffix of the first person singular feminine of the past tense. It is apparently only used in such verbs as end in . The initial; bas developed from a ch, and the final n is the personal termination. I hope that it is not necessary to show in detail that Mr. Hahn's remaining comparisons are just as superficial. On the other hand, the whole conjugational system is quite different in the Dravidian and Mundá languages. The Dravidian system, is very simple, only comprising two or three tenses; in Mundâ, on the other hand, we find an almost bewildering muster of conjugational forms. The Dravidian verb can be characterised as a noun of agency; the Mundâ verb and its various tense bases are indefinite forms which can be used as nouns, adjectives, and verbs. The most characteristic features of the Mandå verb, the categorical a and the incorporation of the direct and indirect object in the verb, are in entire disagreement with Dravidian principles. The Muņda languages, on the other hand, do not possess anything to correspond to the Dravidian negative conjugation. I hope that the preceding remarks will have shown that Mr. Hahn's arguments for the hypothesis of a common origin of the Mundâ and Dravidian families are quite insufficient. The analogies which can be said to exist between both families are of a general kind, and such as can be traced between most languages of the earth, Mr. Hahn is of opinion that there can be no doubt about the classing of Mundári as belonging to the Dravidian family. I think it would be easy to show, with just as good arguments, that Mandari is a Negro language, or a Indo-Chinese form of speech, or what not. It is time to protest energetically against the tendency, which appears to be gaining ascendancy, of combining different languages on the score of accidental similarity in unessential features.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514