Book Title: Epigraphia Indica Vol 02
Author(s): Jas Burgess
Publisher: Archaeological Survey of India

Previous | Next

Page 341
________________ 296 EPIGRAPHIA INDICA. Both lárikhs give the year 1022 (began the 21st February 1613). 27. Three lines (10 4" by 13.) بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم لا اله الا الله محمد رسول الله اللهم صلى على محمد وعلى آل محمد و بارک سلم اشهد ان لا اله الا الله وحده لا شريك له وأشهد أن محمد عبده و رسوله قال الله تعالی ان ازل بيت وضع للناس للذي ببكة مباركا وهدی للعالمين فيه ايات بينات مقام ابراهیم و من دخله كان ومنا الله على الناس حج البيت من استطاع اليه سبيد من كفر فان الله غني عن العالمين صانع قادر تمامی اقتضا کرده بفيض جهان آرا سرای کعبه تمثال عالی چر این خرد كفتا جر ابراهيم بيت الله بنا کرده دل عاصی همی جست از خرد سال بنای ار TRANSLATION. In the name, etc. There is no God, etc. O God, have mercy on Muḥammad and on the descendants of Muhammad. I testify that there is no God, but God who is alone and has no partner. I testify also that Muhammad is His slave and His Apostle. God Almighty has said, “Verily, the first house, etc.” (Qorán, Sûr. iii, 90-91). . (Metre: Hasaj) When this high, Ka'ba-like, world-adorning edifice, through the benevolence of the powerful Creator, was completely erected, the heart of 'Âși was consulting the mind for the year of its erection. The mind said, " just as Abraham has built the house of God." According to the abjad reckoning the tarikh gives 1028 A.H. (began the 19th, December 1618). " The tarikh betrays the name of the builder, viz. Ibrahim Khan Fath Jang, son of Ghiyås Beg of Tahrán. This combination relies upon the very similar tarikh in the Haft Qulzum' (Rückert-Pertsch, p. 223) : baná-yi Ka'ba-ya sdní nihad Ibrahim, the erection of the second Ka'ba has been made by Ibrahim,' where Ibrahim Khân Fath Jang is expressly named as builder. He became governor of Bihar A.H. 1024, and afterwards of Bengal A.H. 1028, and stayed there till 1032, when he was killed in the battle with Prince Shahjahân. The tarikh of the Haft Qulzum gives the date 1040, but as Ibrahim Khân had already died in 1032, this date cannot be correct. Perhaps the izáfat after baná should not be reckoned, so that the year would be 1030.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596