Book Title: Shraman Bhagvana Mahavira Part 3
Author(s): Ratnaprabhvijay, D P Thaker
Publisher: Parimal Publication

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 256
________________ :88: Jinabhadra Gani's [The fourth objects. This involvas self-contradiction in your own argument, which, o Vyakta ! is not at all worthy of you. The point is that in case of establishing the existenoe of objects, mere apekşā would not do. Quality of undertaking an action in an object whigh produces jiāna about its own self, is also an active cause. And that is the reason why hrasva, dirga, and abhaya-each one of which would be producing jbāna about its own self-should be taken as existing. Again, o Vyakta ! you believe that compared to the middle finger, the pradəsint finger is considered as hrasva even if it does not exist. But your argument is absolutely unfounded. For, in comparision with the middle finger, ir pradəsint were taken as hrasva even though it is avidyamāna by its very nature, the horns of an ass that are also a-vidyamāna should be taken as hrasva and a very long substance like indradhvaja should also be taken as hrasva, as the quality of a-vidyamănatā is common in all the three cases. But that is not so. Really spoaking, pradesint finger being vidyamāna by nature and being possessed of a number of properties by virtue of various co-operative causes, manifests manifold variations along 'with the corresponding types of cognizance also. So, it is not correct to assert that the cognizance of hrasva, dirgha eto., is produced in the absolutely non-existent anguli only by means of apo kşa. You might argne at this point that in such CASOS also, dirgha, hrasva, ubhaya eto., are apprehended, and the intellects as regards sva, para, and ubhaya are discriminated only in comparision with another's opinion, and further that according to you, hrasva, dirgha etc, that are svataḥsiddha and that produce jñāna with regard to their own selves, are nothing at all. Even if you believe like that, o Vyakta ! how would you distinguish between your opinion and another's opinion in the midst of all-pervading negation ? Naturally, there would be no distinction between sva and para at all. On the other hand, if you accept this distinotion, there would be bothing like sünyatā at al. (1705-1709) Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586