________________
( 30 ) Fns. 193, 194:
G समपिताः । गृहीत्वा निर्गतः K प्रदत्ताः । राजा गृहीत्वा चचाल
OFFI 151 zetat 71. (31) Fn. 194°: सुखासनाधिरूढा of G is erroneously copied in K as सुखासनादि
T. The scribe of Ms. O first copies K as it is but afterwards becomes aware of the corruption and tries to erase Re putting two small vertical strokes above it. He does not insert fo in place of this fe, probably because the readings of G are not before him. As such his corrected reading becomes a variant of the original
reading of G with no change in the sense : सुखासनारूढा. (32) Fn. 197 : G reads सुवर्णमयापुत्तलिकाभिर्दोरकसंचारेण जल्पितं. K tries to
improve upon this text in its reading स्वर्णमयपुत्तलिकाभिदोरकसंचारकेन afech. O simply copies down the text of K dropping inadvertently the letters #4: Ngam T TE TIT# fei.
(33) Fn. 199: G reads FITTO tecroft. K changes the order and revises
these names as पृथुलश्रोणी १ मनोहरा २. This is in keeping with the names of the eight damsels added by K. O misses one I while copying K: पृथुलश्रेणी १ मनोहरा २. This is only a scribal error since the names of the eight damsels are copied down in the previous
passage quite correctly. ( 34 ) Fn. 201.
Fn. 20r: श्रीपत्तने समागतः of G is corrected in K to पत्तने समागतः which is copied down in O with an erroneous addition of a 1:
qə qalar. (35) Fn. 202: G has the following colophon: 4779AEITIFY: FATA:.
This is slightly condensed in Kas: gefa stacat TTS1904:, which is again condensed by 0 in its colophon which runs thus :
इति मदनभ्रमराजाप्रबंध:. The following are a few instances wherein Mss. G and K agree but o differs:
(1) Fn. 38: G, K read tahi which is corrected in O as ta . (2) Fns. 39, 40: G, K give these two names : erat i a i .
O has only one name 44319 in their place. ( 3 ) Fns. 45, 46G. K read 514673 773 which is given in 0 as 11417
E.
Jain Education International
For Private & Personal Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org
