Book Title: Epigraphia Indica Vol 03
Author(s): Jas Burgess
Publisher: Archaeological Survey of India

Previous | Next

Page 214
________________ No. 25.) SPURIOUS SUDI PLATES. 167 fifteen cantos, or on the fifteenth canto, of the Kiratarjuniya (of Bhåravi). An author named Nripatunga, whom Mr. Rice identifies with the Rashtrakuta king Amoghavarsha I. (A.D. 814-15 to 876-78) says that among previous writers there were Vimaln, Udaya, Nagarjuna, Jayabandhu, and Durvinita; from which Mr. Rice derives corroborative evidence of the existence of the Western Ganga king Durvinita. But, granting that the Nřipatunga in question is Amoghavarsha I., the statement only proves that there was an author named Durvinita at some time before about A. D. 850; and there is nothing in it, either to establish any particular date for him, or even to shew that he was & Ganga. An unpublished grant from Hebbar states that Darvinîta was taught by the author of the Sabdávatára ; i.e., Mr. Rice says, by Pujyapada, — whose date, he holds, is thus established. Whether this author was the celebrated Pujyapâda, - what the date of that Pujyapada w98,- and what, if anything, it may prove in connection with Durvinita,- I am not at present prepared to consider. But, at any rate, the date which is to be deduced for Darvinita from these sparious records, has no weight of any kind in determining the date of Půjyapada. His son was Mushkara, whose name appears in the British Museum grant in the form of Mokkara. The same record styles him either Raja or Vriddharaja; but the Hosûr and Någamangala grants do not give him any title. The British Museum grant says that he married a daughter of Sindhurâja, or of the king of Sindhu. The Lakshmêshwar inscription mentions Jain temple called Mukkaravasati:3 this may possibly be taken as showing that, at some time before A.D. 978, there really was a Ganga king or prince named Mushkara, Mukkara, or Mokkara : but it fixes no specific date for him; and it can hardly be said to suffice to prove the genealogy given in the spurious records. His son was Vikrama or Srivikrama,* with whose name, again, the British Museum grant connects the title of Raja or Vriddhardja; the Hosûr and Nagamangala grants do not give him any title. No historical facts are stated in connection with him. His son was Bhuvikrama, with whose name the British Museum grant connects the title of Mahadhiraja; the Hosor and Nagamangala grants do not give him any title. He seems to have had the biruda of Srivallabha. And he is said to have defeated an unnamed Pallava king, in battle at a place named Vilanda or Vilandha. The British Museum grant says also that he subjugated the whole of the Pallava dominions. His younger brother was Sivamâra, to whose name the Hogar and Nagamangala grants attach the genuine title of Maharaja. He had the biruda of Nava-Káma. Also, from a copper-plate grant from Suradhênapura, Mr. Rice gives him the biruda of Nava-Choka. And be further suggests that he may be the Kambayya, supposed to be also called Nava-Léka, who is mentioned in one of the Sravaņa-Belgola inscriptions as the son of a king named Srivallabha:6 but, from ink-impressions received from Dr. Hultzsch, I am able to say that the true biruda in the inscription in question is Raņávalóka; and this, compared with Khadgåvalôka in the case of Dantidurga, is suggestive of a Rashtrakūta king or prince. The name of Sivamâra's son is not given in the Hosûr, Nagamangala, and British Museum grants. And they also state no history in connection with him. But the Udayêndiram grant, - which, as regards the interval, simply tells us that, in the line of Konganivarman, there were Vishạngôpa, Hari, Madhava, Durvinîta, Bhûvikrama, and other kings,"— seems to Dame him either as Prithuyaśas or as Pțithivipati; and it mentions, in connection with him, a • Karnataka-Sabdánuédsanam, Introd. pp. 7, 19, 23. Coorg Inscriptions, Introd. p. 3, and Inscriptions at Sravana-Belgola, Introd. pp. 58 and note, 69; see also Kargitaka- Sabdánulásanam, Introd. Pp. 18, 19. * Ind. Ant. Vol. VII. p. 109. • The following name, 'Bhuvikrama,' suggests that sri may bere be intended to be part of the name. But otherwise it would not be admissible (see Gupta Inscriptions, p. 9, Dote). . Inacriptions at Srarana-Belgola, Introd. pp. 14, 68. ibid.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472