Book Title: Jainism in South India and Some Jaina Epigraphs
Author(s): P B Desai
Publisher: Jain Sanskruti Samrakshak Sangh Solapur

Previous | Next

Page 269
________________ JAINA EPIGRAPHS : PART II 243 eclipse occurred in any other month of the year, although there was a lunar eclipse on Pushya paurņimā, Saturday. In this anomalous position, however, a suggestion regarding the probable date is happily forthcoming from an unpublished inscription of my collection at Nimbargi, a village situated at a distance of a few miles from Hunasi-Hadagali. The Nimbargi epigraph belongs to the reign of the same king as of the present record, and records a gift made under identical circumstances. We are told in the Nimbargi inscription that in the 23rd regnal year and Bahudhānya samvatsara, the king was on the bank of the ver Narmadā and had performed the Talāpurusha ceremony on the occasion of the solar eclipse on the new-moon day of Pushya. It looks imporbable that the king stayed in the camp on the bank of the Narmadā issuing gifts for over seven months from Jyōshtha to Pushya, as we shall have to assume, if the dates of both these records are believed to be correct. For this reason we have to accept one and reject the other. We have seen above how the date of the HuñasiHadagali record is unsatisfactory. So we would leave it out of consideration for the time being. Now let us concentrate on the date of the Nimbargi record and examine it in some detail. In the cyclic year Bahudhānya no solar eclipse occurred on the Pushya amāvāsyā; but in the two previous years Dhātội and Isvara solar eclipses did occur on the specified tithi. Setting aside the case of the year Dhātři in our present investigation as it would be farther from our point, we shall confine ourselves with the solar eclipse in the year īśvara. The discrepancy of the weekday is still there in this case also as the eclipse occurred on Tuesday and not on Thursday as stated in the Nimbargi record. But this may be ignored. An important aspect of the transaction deserves to be noticed at this juncture. It was a momentous occasion when the king must have accorded his consent to several religious gifts of varied nature. The benefactions which were thus formally sanctioned on the bank of the Narmadā were subsequently given effect to and recorded in their respective places on stone with proper procedure and due ceremony. These events must necessar entailed some lapse of time in their execution. The interval of time and space and the complications of the administrative procedure appear to have been therefore responsible for the failure in noting correctly the details of the original date of the grants on the part of the local officials. Taking these factors into consideration the real position appears to be like this. The king was on the bank of the Narmada in the month of Pushya in the cyclic year Isvara. On the occasion of the solar eclipse which occurred on the new-moon day of the month, he performed the Tulāpurusha ceremony and sanctioned grants to various religious institutions in his kingdom. These charities were

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495