Book Title: Jainism in South India and Some Jaina Epigraphs
Author(s): P B Desai
Publisher: Jain Sanskruti Samrakshak Sangh Solapur

Previous | Next

Page 332
________________ 306 ; JAINTSM IN SOUTH INDIA figures, comprised three hundred villages. One of the inscriptions from Nāgāi furnishes a genealogical account of a family of these chiefs. An inscription from Handarki takes this account two generations forward. In this genealogical account occurs the name Aicha, which appears to be a variant of Echa. But as Écha of the present epigraph is about two generations later than Aicha of the Nāgāi or Handarki inscriptions we are not well advised in identifying the two. This leads us to the surmise that Echabhūpa of our record was either a later member of the above family or belonged to a collateral branch of the same. The latter conjecture is supported by the fact that Echabhūpa is associated with the tract of Mirinte only, whereas the other members of the family figuring in the Nāgāi and Handarki records are connected with the two tracts, Aral and Mirinte. This distinction may be explained by assuming that the original family was split up subsequently and their territory also was divided. Regarding Koppadēva who forms the subject of praise in the inscription, no details are furnished. But it is known from the following record that he was the chief of Adakki and held the responsible office of the commander of forces. We shall revert to him again while dealing with the next epigraph. Adverting to the teacher Guņavīra Siddhāntadēva, the record is not adequately communicative in regard to the historical details, such as his lineage, spiritual ancestry, monastic headquarters, etc. The only items of information we know about him are that he was a disciple of Nömichandra Siddhāntadēva and belonged to the Vandiyūr gaņa. The Vandiyūr gaṇa is not noticed previously and is introduced for the first time by the present record. This piece of information is further amplified by another inscription in the present collection ( No.15), which again refers to this gaṇa and associates it with the Yāpanīya Samgha. From the general description of Guņavira Siddhāntadēva, the following points may be gathered about him. He was a zealous advocate and a great supporter of the Jaina doctrine. Well-versed in the system of Jaina philosophy, he successfully refuted the tenets of the rival schools. Profound in knowledge and immersed in austerities, he wielded great influence among the followers of his faith. Although no specific date is mentioned in the record, an attempt may be made to assign an approximate date to it. From the fact that the epigraph refers itself to the reign of Vikramāditya VI, who ruled from A. D. 1076 to 1126., we may, in the first instance, fix these years as the broad limits of our inscription. But these limits can be narrowed down on the following 1 Hyderabad Archaeological Series, No. 8, p. 26. % My unpublished private collection.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495