Book Title: Illuminator of Jaina Tenets
Author(s): Tulsi Acharya
Publisher: Jain Vishva Bharati

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 27
________________ XXV INTRODUCTION upheld, but qualitative change was denied or rather reduced to change of place. Unlike Parmenides, the atomists accepted the reality of the void in order to explain motion Atomism was a synthesis of Eleatic monism and Pythagorean pluralism. Change was admitted by the atomists only as a change of position. By this view of change, as well as by their anticipation of the law of constancy of matter, the atomists greatly strengthened substantialist modes of thought. The antisubstantialist trend in Greek philosophy was represented by Heraclitus of Ephesus. Heraclitus argued "All change is contradictory; therefore contradiction (the unity of opposites) is the very essence of reality.” The world of Heraclitus was the dynamic unity of process, in which each momentary phase was continuously transformed into its "opposite", that is, into a subsequent qualitatively different phase. 1 Heraclitus, in insisting on the fluidity of everything, virtually rejected the existence of any unchanging substrate or vehicle of motion. He also held that becoming is irreversible : "You cannot step twice into the same river." The subsequent development of Greek, medieval, and, to a considerable extent, modern philosophy was dominated by the antinomy of Being and Becoming. In most philosophical systems Being was given prominence while Becoming was placed in an inferior and subordinate role. In modern philosophy, the Greek and medieval pattern of two realms, eternal and temporal, was retained in various systems of pantheistic monism. The transcendent eternity of the medieval God was repla- ced by an impersonal immanent order of nature that was devoid of change as the Parmenidean Being, Aristotle's God, Plato's Ideas, and Plotinus' One From Giordano Bruno to F.H. Bradley this basic pattern remained the same. Denial of change is not always coupled with denial of diversity as various instances of static pluralism show. I Other thinkers, more interested in concrete empirical features of change than in its ultimate ontological status, began to explore psychologically the perception of change, which could not be separated from 1 Compare the Yogácāra philosopher Sthiramati's definition of pariņāma : kāraņakỹana-nirodha-samakalah karana-ksana-vilaksanah kāryasyātmalabhah parilãmah -Bhāfya on Trimsikā, 1. Jain Education International For Personal & Private Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252