________________
of the rela
Plurality is a fact, although it may be From the stand-poinë another kind of experience. Anyhow to give tion between it the name of Illusion (H141) is not to explain the One and the Many. it. The question then turns to this. How
thus Illusion comes to be reconciled with the Absolute? How is this solution possible, if the Absolute is the One without a second to stand by it (TFÄarfsatzi). And the Ultimate Reality without anything to aid or stand by it being One, what is the source of this Illusion of Plurality. Thus the whole question resolves itself into the Relation of Unity and Plurality.
If the ultimate reality be many, how can Difficulties you explain a single self-existent coherent in the estab. lishment of system? If there is a relationship between the Relation
A. B. C. D., and so on then these are elements of a single whole and so related to each other.
If you begin with the Absolute separation Set out in a between Unity and Plurality, then you must alternative. either deny Plurality like Shankar or deny
Unity like Kanâd, the propounder of the Specific (Vaisheshika) school of thought. But these difficulties crop up only on the assumption that the ultimate Reality is either One or
Definite
164
