________________
They are
ent nor absolutely nondifferent.
to find that this is the persisting and universal element in the thing and that is the non-persisting particular aspect of the thing. Just as an effect or a particular lutely differ thing gives rise to the idea of one thing. the effect plus cause and the particular along with the universal gives rise to the idea of one thing only. And this is how we are enabled to recognise each individual thing, placed as it is amongst a multitude of things differing in place, time, capacity and substance. Each thing
SO
Rather they being thus endowed with double aspect, the
stånd in
relation of theory of cause and effect or universal and
unity in
differences. particular, being absolutely distinct and
different falls to ground under the weight of the overwhelming evidences of senseperception.
It might be contended here that if on account of grammatical co-ordination and the consequent of idea oneness, the judgment 'this Jar is clay' is taken to mean the relation of unity in difference i.e. both difference and non-difference as well, then we are led by a coherent train of thought to infer from such judgments as I am a man' or 'I am a god',
170
A fresh ob jection to the
doctrine of
Unity in Difference.
