Book Title: Vaishali Institute Research Bulletin 1 Author(s): Nathmal Tatia Publisher: Research Institute of Prakrit Jainology & Ahimsa MujjaffarpurPage 28
________________ NATURE OF VALID COGNITION 17 and uncontaminated in the enlightened conscio usness centres." There are three propositions distinguishable in the extract quoted above and each of them deserves meticulous examination. The first proposition is that consciousness is momentary and there is no perdurable identical subject. The second one is that the subject consisting in a series of consciousness-units continues without break, one consciousness-unit followed by the subsequent one as its effect. The third proposition is that the subjective centres are numerically different from one another. The first proposition asserts that consciousness-units are momentary and infinite in number forming an unending continuum. Obviously the doctrine of momentariness is borrowed from the Sautrāntikas who make causal efficiency (arthakriyakaritva) the sole criterion of existence. Rival philosophers have advanced powerful arguments against the conception of causal efficiency as the sole criterion of existence. It is found that even illusory experience such as the experience of snake in a rope produces trepidation and the relevant motor activities. The snake appearance makes the erring subject spring back from it to a safe distance and that of silver in the nacre induces a forward movement for its acquisition. The causal efficiency of these illusions is undeniable, yet it cannot be real, belonging as it does to a false appearance. Furthermore causality has been shown by Dharmakirti in his work Sambandhaparik şa3 to be a convenient figment of understanding. In brief, causality cannot be an objective relation because the terms, cause and effect, are not synchronous and relation must subsist between two terms. In the present case the cause ceases to be when the effect comes into being. The relation is imposed by the subject as a convenient expedient of systematization of experience. It is a form or way of understanding as Kant maintains. Dharmakirti has anticipated Kant. It follows that the conclusion of momentariness of existents based on the argument of causal efficiency must collapse with its basis cut asunder. Let us now examine the second postulate that the subject is an unending continuum of plural consciousness-units, one following on 1. Vijñaptimātramevedam traidhātukam, tacca vijñanam pratisattvasantāna. bhedad anantam avisuddhañcänadhigatatattvānām, visuddham ca prahinavarapānām pratikşaņavisarāru ca sarvaprāṇabhstām ojāyate, Tattvasaingraha (G.O.S.), p. 550. 2. For detailed discussion the reader is referred to my book The Buddhist Philosophy of Universal Flux. 3. Reproduced in a large number in the Prameyakamalamārtanda and Syad vādaratnākara. Sce also the Chapter entitled "Relations in The Jaina Philosophy of Non-absolutism. Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.orgPage Navigation
1 ... 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 ... 414