Book Title: Sambodhi 1981 Vol 10
Author(s): Dalsukh Malvania, H C Bhayani, Nagin J Shah
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 53
________________ Why did Jainism not develop the View (1) A exists; (2) A does not exist; (3) A both exists and does not exist; (4) A neither exists nor does not exist. In a particular case any of these could apply or (5) none or (6) all of them, theoretically speaking. Nāgārjuna concludes that Samsāra=Nirvāņa because option (5) can be applied to both. Comparable to the catuṣkoți of Buddhist logic is the septabhangi8 of Jaina logic. The basic difference between the two is that in Buddhism "only one alternative could be true, but in Jainism each of the seven alternate forms of description (or any disjunction of them) could be true”.9 It is true that the fourth member of the catuṣkoți (neither is nor is not) is not included in the Jaina seven-fold formula', but the former distinction that is the Buddhist case only one option can apply and in the Jain case all can apply is much more significant. Yet the fact remains that if Nāgārjuna could say that none of the four statements apply in the case of Saṁsāra and Nirvăņa, the Jains could argue that all of them apply - in the spirit of the Saptabhangi - to both Samsāra and Nirvāṇa and therefore they are the same ! After all if the Buddhists regard the nature of Reality as empty, the Jains regard it undetermined, 10 IV But Jainism never moved in that direction. Why? The reason appears to be that while logically this was possible, ontologically it was not because Buddhism does not concede a soul and in it Nirvāṇa possesscs no definite location. But in Jainism not only is there the jiva, it possesses a spatial quality in that it is variable in size. Not only that the kaivalya is spatially located - at the siddha-śila on top of the lokākaśa. How then could samsara and nirvana be identified when their spatial locations differ! V To conclude, although logically there was no obstacle to the identity of samsära = Nirvāņa arising in Jainism as in Buddhism, ontologically the spatial dimension associated with the fiva and kaivalya, notwithstanding the commonality of the association of the spatial dimension with the two, prevented this from happening. Jain Education International For Personal & Private Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340