Book Title: Sambodhi 1981 Vol 10
Author(s): Dalsukh Malvania, H C Bhayani, Nagin J Shah
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 92
________________ R. L. Raval Abu Said Abdul Khair, the founder of a mystical school in Nishapar. Thus, we find in Ibn Sina, a devout Muslim, a pagan streak of thinking. Hj kaowledge had been growing with his advance in age and his views had undergono significant change in many matters, perhaps owing to the influence of Sufism on him. In this context Ibn Sina's philosophy of being is worth examining. III • Ibn Sina developed the fundamental concept of Being. In Kitab-al-Nafat he writes, “Being can not be commented upon except by the name of being for it is the first principle of all comments". According to Ibn Sina, we possess an intuitive notion of the reality of Being. In his typical way of explaining it he gives his famous imaginary example of a "Floating man", who is suddenly created, who can not see or hear, who is in space and whose organs are so disposed that they can not touch each other. This "floating man', can not use or exercise his physical senses. And even if he can not acquire the notion of Being through an external experience he will still acquire it through self conscionsness. Thus according to Ibn Sina, the existance of Being can not be empirically proved or analysed or argued upon. It means that it is a direct perception of reality. Somewhat similar view is expressed in Mundakopanišad. Accordingly, this Being or Brahma is everywhere. It encompasses everything. It is the supreme. It can not be grasped by reading Vedas. It can not be analysed by even the sharpest of intellects. It can be realized only by one who is completely open to it. " However, to apprehend Being, Ibn Sina has tried to give a philosophical formula, which, though seems like an Aristotelian cne, it, to some extent, does not suffer from the limitations of what is called a metapbsical doubt or inherent contradiction in the very proceess of reasoning. Thus, in order to develop the philosophy of Being, Ibn Sina has given us a framework of the “Necessary Being and Possible Being," as a mode of communication, though ontologically there is only Being. Here, the modifications in Aristotle are evident in Ibn Sina's notion of God, his doctrine of creation and cosmology. He describes God not only as eternal, unchanging, immaterial and Uomoved Mover but also as the Being whose existence is necessary'. Ibn Sina's description of all beings in the world other than the SINecessary Beiog" appears at first to be involved. The beings in the world, when considered in themselves, are only possible. It means they may or may not exist, Jain Education International For Personal & Private Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340