Book Title: Sambodhi 1976 Vol 05
Author(s): Dalsukh Malvania, H C Bhayani
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad

Previous | Next

Page 224
________________ 126 Padmanabh s. taini A great deal of original research has been devoted to the connections of Jainism with Makkabli Gosala and the Ājivikas, but here again the Digambara tradition has been largely ignored. Basham has collected almost everything available in the Svetambara canon and has given a creditable account of the sect and its connection with Mahavira Hoerne claims that the Digambaras are actually the ancient Ājvlkas 11 Basham rejects this view on the basis of the Digambara author Nemicandra's distinction between the Nirgranthas and the ĀJIyikas.12 He suggests rather that some of the southern Ājivikag may have been absorbed by the Digambaras, but this is the extent to which Basham considers the Digambaras at all No scholar bas searched through the Digambara texts for mention of Makkhali Gosala, assuming, no doubt, that since the Digambaras do not possess the canon, they have no recollection of Makkbali's encounter with Mahavira There are, however, two texts, 18 Bhavasangraha and Darsanasara, both by Devasena of the eleventh century, wbich seem to have been overlooked even by Basham, They preserve an ancient Digambara tradition that Makkhali (Gosāla] was a follower of (the tradition of) Paráva and hoped to be chosen the chief disciple (ganad hara) of Mabavira When he was not thus chosen, he walked out of Mabavira's assembly and established the creed of ajnanayada. The Digambara sonrcea seem to tako "ananavada" 1n this sense, "nowledge does not make any difference to the achievement of salvation," a belief which probably echoes the well-known AjIvika doctrine that both fools and wise (bale ca pandite ca) alike (wandering in transmigration exactly for the allotted time, ahall then, and only then,) make an end of suff. ering (dukkhassa'ntam karissantt)"(Digha Nikaya, 1, p 54). The Digambaras, it 18 true, make no reference to the contact between Makkhali and Mabavira prior to the latter's attaining Jinahood, nor to the subsequent episode of the violent confrontation which led to the death of Makkhali, as narrated in the Svetambara cagon Bat a close scrutiny of the works of Devagena shows traces of some memory of a past dispute. For, whereas the Svetambaras aubsequently allow Makkahlı to attain salvation, the Digambaras say that as a result of harbouring the doctrine of afnunqvada he was born in the lowest existence possible, that of nitya-nigoda, a state from which there 18 no emergence into a higher birth, Why the Digambaras would want to take such extraordinary punitive action against Makkball must remain a mystory, Lo any case, the Digambara references to Makkhalt Gosala remain to bo stadiod properly and evaluated for the light they may throw on the deterministic elements in Jainism, Among auch elements there la, for example, their doctrine of bhavyatva and abhavyatva (a doctrine equally accepted by the Syotambaras) according to which only certain souls are capable of attaining galvation while others, lacking that capacity, are conde. mned forever to life in samsara.ls Reference may also be made in this

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416