Book Title: Epigraphia Indica Vol 32
Author(s): D C Sircar, B Ch Chhabra,
Publisher: Archaeological Survey of India

Previous | Next

Page 98
________________ 65 No. 5] THREE GRANTS FROM CHINCHANI to the mathika. The svadhyayikas of the Maha-parshad or Kautuka-maṭhika of Samyana are mentioned several times in the Chinchani plate of the reign of Rashtrakuta Krishna III as well as in the last of the three grants edited here. One of the svadhyayikas, Chihada by name, received the gift which was made as a namasya-vritti (i.e. a permanent tax-free holding), free from all obligations. People were warned not to cause any obstacle in the enjoyment of the oil-mill by the donee. It is stated that the mill was granted together with the oil and oil-cakes (ghatika for Sanskrit khalika) produced by it probably meaning that the produces of the mill were free from taxation like the mill itself. Lines 21-28 quote some of the usual imprecatory and benedictory stanzas together with certain prose passages of similar import, which are both generally met with in the Silahāra charters. The concluding part of the record in lines 29-32 states, in the style of the Silahara grants, how the donor made his decree known through the language of the charter as drafted by the scribe and how the authoritative character of the grant could not be challenged on the basis of mistakes creeping into the text. The sentence beginning with matam mama in this section refers in the usual way to the signature of the donor put on the original document later incised on the plates. But a peculiarity of the present inscription is that Chamuṇḍaraja's name is mentioned here together with a string of epithets. One of these refers to the 64 black horses received by him from an unspecified source. In the passage in question, Tribhuvana-nila Mahamandalesvara Chamunḍarāja is represented as the son of Ahava-nila Mahamaṇḍalēśvara Vijja-rāņaka. The charter is stated to have been written by Dhruva Mammalaiya. The official designation Dhruva is a contraction of Dhruv-adhikaranika, etc., which indicate an officer in charge of the collection of the royal share of the produce from the farmers. The importance of the inscription lies in the fact that it introduces Chamuṇḍaraja, ruler of Samyāna under Silahāra Chhinturaja (Chhittarāja), as also Vijja-ranaka, father of Chamunḍarāja and probably an earlier ruler of Samyana under the same Silahāra king. The family to which Vijja and Chamunda belonged is not mentioned. Since, however, the name Vijja-rāņaka or Vijjala was also borne by the Mōdha chief of Samyana who issued the other two charters to be edited below, it is not impossible that the two Vijja-ranakas belonged to the same family. Thus Chamunda may have belonged to the Mōdha dynasty. But it should be admitted that the relationship that may have existed between Chamunda, who issued the present grant in 1034 A.D., and Vijja or Vijjala, who issued the other two grants a few years later in 1048 and 1053 A.D., cannot be determined without further light being thrown on the subject by future discoveries. Of the geographical names mentioned in the inscription, Tagarapura, to which the Silahāras appear to have traced their origin, is now generally identified with Ter in the Naldrug District of the former Hyderabad State.1 Chamunda is stated to have been ruling over the pattana or town of Samyana (elsewhere called only Samyana), which had been granted to him by Silähära Chhinturaja (Chhittarāja). Samyana-pattana is of course the present town of Sanjan in the Thana District. But the exact extent of the land under Chamunda's rule cannot be determined, although it may have been much smaller than the Samyana-maṇḍala under Madhumati Sugatipa of the Chinchani plates of the time of Indra III and the Samyana-pattana 700 mentioned in the second of the two sets of Chinchani plates of Mōdha Vijja, to be edited below. Chamunda is also stated to have destroyed certain ruler or rulers of the Lața country in the present Nausari-Broach region. The inscription does not state where the Kautuka-mathika was situated; but we know from the Chinchani plates of the time of Indra III that the mathika was built by Kautuka and others at Samyana itself. 1 CL. JRAS, 1901, pp. 537 ff.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512