Book Title: Epigraphia Indica Vol 32
Author(s): D C Sircar, B Ch Chhabra,
Publisher: Archaeological Survey of India

Previous | Next

Page 152
________________ 107 No. 11] INSCRIPTIONS OF CHANDRAS OF ARAKAN throngh Dharma. This probably suggests that he normally succeeded his predecessor on the throne and was not a usurper. The importance of the two inscriptions lies in the fact that they are the only epigraphic records of kings Nitichandra and Virachandra of the Buddhist royal family of the Chandras of Arakan although both the rulers are known from their coins as well as the Mrohaung pillar inscription of AnandachandraNītichandra's coins bear the legond Niti or Nitichandra wbile Virachandra is similarly called Vira or Virachandra on his coins. As pointed out above, the Mrohaung inscription of Anandachandra mentions Virachandra as Viryachandra. The Mrolaung pillar inscription gives very valuable information regarding the genealogy and chronology of the Chandras of Arakan, who had their capital at Vēsäll. It is a prasasti of king Anandachandra belonging to a family called Dēv-āņdaj-anvaya or sri-Dharmaraj-indaja-vamsa. Anandachandra's father Dharmachandra seems to be described as belonging to the Is-anvaye, probably meaning 'a family of kings' or a royal family', while an ancestor of Anandachandra, named Vajrasakti, is called 'born in the Dēva family 'either to impart the same idea or to indicate that his mother belonged to the Dēva dynasty. The word andaja means a bird and dev-andaja possibly indicates the divine bird Garuda. The expression fri-Dharmarāj-ändaja-varsa possibly means the birit (Garuda) family of the illustrious and virtuous kings'. The inscription was written for recounting Anandachandra's pious activities in the first nine years of his reign and was apparently engraved in his ninth regnal year. While the second part of the inscription is a eulogy of Anandachandra, its first part contains three sections quoting the names of the kings together with the duration of their reigns, who were believed to have ruled over the area in question before Anandaobandra. The first of these three sections deals with certain kings who altogether ruled for 1016 or 1060 (sahasrar shad-las-ūdhikam) years. The beginning of this section is damaged ; but, as all the five kings at the commencement of the extant portion are stated to have each ruled for 120 years, it is clear that this section (or at least its earlier part) is mythical. The second section deals with the Chandra kings, sixteen of whom are stated to have ruled for 230 years. The list, however, enumerates only thirteen names although their reign-periods as quoted in it come up to 230 years. This is possibly because three kings of the dynasty, who may have ruled for a few weeks or months, were omitted from the list. The last of the three sections deals with the family to which Anandachandra belonged and quotes the names of his eight predecessors stated to have together iuled for 119 years and 9 months. While the first section reminds us of the mythical account of the ancient history of Kashmir in the earlier chapters of Kalhana's Rājatarangini, the second and third sections resemble the genealogical part of the inscriptions of such dynasties as the Eastern Chalukyas of Vengi and the Imperial Gangas of Kalinga and have the appearance of being based on fairly authentic information. It has, however, to be pointed out that Indian inscriptions, earlier than Anandachandra's record, often quote the names of the predecessors of a king generally without the duration of their reigns. The chronology of the Chandras of Arakan depende on the determination of the date not only of their coins and the inscriptions now under study but also of the Mrohaung pillar inscription of Anandachandra. Johnston points out how the script of Anandachandra's record is 'almost entirely identical' with that of the Nalanda inscription of Yasovarman both in the form of the Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, op. cit., p. 381 and Plato: Phayre, Coins of Arakan, of Pegu and Burma, pp. 28-29 and Plate II ; Smith, Catalogue of Coins in the Indian Mweum, Vol. I, Plate XXXI, No.9. Smith wrongly reads Sri-Sivasyn (or Givasya) for Ntlichandra. *Cf. Stein, Rajatarangini, trans., Vol. I, Introduction, pp. 62 ff.; SI1, Vol. 1, pp. 36 ff.; above, Vol. XXVIII, pp. 235 ff. Bhandarkar's List, No. 2105: above, Vol. XX, pp. 37 ff.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512