Book Title: Epigraphia Indica Vol 32
Author(s): D C Sircar, B Ch Chhabra,
Publisher: Archaeological Survey of India

Previous | Next

Page 333
________________ No. 30) VILASA GRANT OF PROLAYA-NAYAKA 243 Sulţāns of Delhi despatched against Tiling. According to Barani, Sulţăn 'Ala-ad-din Khalji planned an invasion of Tiling as early as 1301 A. D. Four or five months after the Sultan left Rantambhor', says he, Ulugh Khan collected a large force with the intention of attacking Tiling and Ma'abar, bat his time was come, and the angel of destiny took him to the blessed city. His corpse was conveyed to Delhi and buried in his own house'. The expedition to Tiling did not obviously proceed. The idea was not, however, abandoned. Some two years later, at the time when the Sultan was engaged in the siege of Chitor, Malik Fakhr-ud-din Jūna, dadbak-i-Ilazarat and Malik Jhāju of Karra, nephew of Nostat Khān, had been sent with all the forces of Hindustan against Arangal'. On their arrival there the rainy season began and proved such a hindrance that the army could do nothing and in the beginning of the winter returned, greatly reduced in numbers, to Hindustan. The expedition thus ended in disaster. Although the Muslim historians attribute the failure to the outbreak of rains, it is not unlikely that they came into condict with the Tilingas and were worsted by them in the fight. The failure of the expedition rankled in the mind of Alā-ud-din ; and in 1309-10 A. D., he despatched another expedition under the famous Malik Nalib Käfür and Khwaja Haji, the 'āriz-iMamālik. This expedition, according to the unanimous testimony of Muslim historians, was a resounding success of Muslim arms. The details of it are far too well known to need description. The Muslim armies marched to Warangal by way of Dovagiri without meeting serious opposition on the way ; defeated the Kākatiya forces, laid siege to and captured the outside mud fort, and invested the inner stone fort. Pratāparudra sued for peace. Malik Nā'ib Kāfür agreed to accede to his request on condition that he surrendered all his wealth, together with his elephants and horses, jewels and valuables and promised to send every year a certain amount of treasure and a certain number of elephants by way of tribute to Delhi. Pratäparudra who had no alternative accepted the conditions and Malik Na'ib Käfür raised the siege, and marched away to Delhi laden with booty.: Of the next invasion, which was sent from Dēvagiri in 1318 A. D. by Sulţăn Qutb-ud-din Mubarak Shāh, two conflicting accounts have come down to us. The cause of the expedition was the failure of Pratāparudra to pay the annual tribute for some years. To collect the arrears of this tribute, the Sultan sent Khusru Khān at the head of an army to Tiling. According to Amirkhusru, Pratāparudra offered resistance, but was defeated and had to purchase peace at a very heavy price. Amir Khusru's account of Khusru Khan's expedition to Tiling reads like another version of Nalik Nā'ib Kāfür's invasion in 1310 A.D. The encounter with Prataparudra forces, their lefeat, the investment and capture of the mud fert, the attack on the stone fort, and Prataparudra's surrender of all his wealth besides elephants and horses, follow the same pattern." "Işāiny, who also describes Khusru Khān's expedition to Tiling, narrates the events differently: he does not refer to hostilities. Pratāparudra, on the contrary, is said to have receivedl Khusu kilan with respect, paid the tribute due to the Sultan readily and sent him back to Dēvayiri well satisfied." Which of these two accounts is true is not easy to decide. Elliot, History of India, Vol. III, p. 179. • Ibid., p. 189, Nizam-ud-din Ahmad makes a casual reference to this expedition. The flower of the Sul. tan's army had, however, marched to the extreme south of the Dakin, to conquer Arangal' (Tubagat.i.1kbart, Eng. trans, Vol. I, p. 173). Tori hta also states that hwing to the absence of his army, which went on an expedition to Waranagal, 'Alā-ud-din was in no condition to face the Mughal invader Targhi on equal terms (Briggs, Ferishta, Vol. I., p. 354). * Ibid., p. 202-03. "A few variations, no doubt, occur. Pratāparudra is said to bave ceded five districts of his kingdom to tbe Sultan; these were, however, given back excepting the fort of Badrkot (Elliot, Flixtory of India, Vol. III, PP 559-61). Futüh-us-Salatin (Madrus cdn.), PP. 361-63.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512