Book Title: Indian Antiquary Vol 38 Author(s): Richard Carnac Temple Publisher: Swati PublicationsPage 88
________________ 84 THE INDIAN ANTIQUARY. [APRIL, 1909. ANCIENT HISTORY OF THE NELLORE DISTRICT. BY V. VENKAYYA, M. A., RAI BAHADUR. (Continued from Vol. XXXVIII, p. 11.) The period of about 30 years commencing from A. D. 1250 to 1280 is but poorly represented in the inscriptions of the southern tâlukas of the Nellore district. There are no records from Râpûr, Sülürpet, and Venkatagiri, which can be referred to this period while there are only a few from the Nellore and Gûdûr tâlukas. The Pandya invasion which took place during this period?3 must have caused considerable confusion in the southern portion of the district.73 The Chĉda chiefs were probably crippled on this account. Bhujabalavira. Manmasiddayadeva Chôḍamahârâja (KR. 60, 61 and 68) who had one or more Pallava feudatories and whose dates range from Saka-Samvat 1179 to 1188 A. D. 1256-57 to 1260-61 and [I]mmadi-Gandagopala-Vijayadityadêva-Maharaja (KR. 62) who had also a Pallava fendatory and whose date is A. D. 1260-61 belong to this period. But their inscriptions have all been found at Pentråla in the Kandukûr taluks, and consequently it is donbtful if they belonged to the Nellore The Telagu-Chodas of Pentrála. Telugu-Chôdas or if their influence extended beyond that village. The same remark applies to the following three chiefs whose records have also been found in the same village :-(1) Bijjiraju-Siddayadêva-Chôḍamahârâju whose date is A. D. 1267-68 (KR. 64); (2) Gaḍidêvaraju, son of Perumândidêva-Chôḍamahârâju whose date is A. D. 1268-69 (KR. 65); and Siddayadeva-Mahârâja, (son of) Bhimarija, whose date is A. D. 1269-70 (KR. 66). According to the Telugu Siddhéévaracharitramu and Somadevar djiyamu, extracts from which are published by Rao Bahadur K. Viresalingam Pantalu Garu in his Lives of the Telugu Poets, Manmasiddha, the ruler of Nellore, Lad been deprived of his kingdom by his cousins, Akkana and Bayyana. Tikkana Somayajin, the court poet of the former, is said to have gone to Anamkonda and persuaded the Kakatiya king Ganapati to take up the cause of his patron. Records assignable without doubt to this Manmasiddha have not been found.75 12 Above Vol. XXXVII., p. 853. 13 A number of inscriptions dated during the reign of Tribhuvanaohakravartin Gandagopaladera or Vijaya: Gandagopaladeva have been found in the Tamil country. One of them seems to have been a contemporary of the Kakatiya king Ganapati (No. 47 of 1898) and another of the Chola king Kulottunga III. (No. 44 of 1898 and South-Ind. Insors., Vol. III, p. 207 1.). In the Annual Report for 1899-1900, para. 51, I remarked that the VijayaGandagopaladeva, whose initial date is A. D. 1250 and who must have reigned until at least A. D. 1266, must have been a Telugu-Choda. In the first place, it is not certain if there was only one chief with this name or more than one. In the Nellore district, records of Tribhuvanachakravartin Vijaya-Gandagopala are found in the Güdür, Nellore, and Salarpet talukas. They are all'in Tamil. In case the latter is identical with the former, his dates seem to show that he might have taken part in the attempt to drive out Jatavarman Sundara-Pindya L from Nellore, if any such been had made. In the inseriptions of the Pandya king, it is Vira (not. Vijaya)-Gandagopala that figures as one of his enemies (Ind. Ant., Vol. XXI, p. 121). A Tamil epigraph of Tribhuvanachakravartia- Vira Gandagopala has been found at Ramagiri in the Chingleput district (No. 650 of 1904) and another at Mallam in the Güdür taluka (G. 67). 14 At Ayyavaripalli and Nandipfd, in the Udayagiri taluka, have been found inscriptions of Bhujabala-Choda Tiruk[A]ltidéra-Maharaja, dated in A.D. 1244-45 (U. 3) and A. D. 1945-46 (U. 14). He was the lord of Uralyar and Kohl and belonged to the family of Karikala. If he was related to the Pentrala Chodas, he must have been one of their ancestors. Neither the Mahamandalbicara Manmasiddhayadeva-Chodamaharaja of KV. 48 nor the Manmasiddarasar of G. 39 could have had anything to do with the Pentrála Chibas. 18 Manmagandagopala, a later prince of the Nellore Chodas, was also deprived of his kingdom, but was reinstated at Vikramasimhapura by a Kakatiya fondatory (Annual Report on Epigraphy for 1905-06, Part II, para. 46). It is not impossible that the Manmasiddha reinstated by Gapapati is identical with the Bhujabala. vira-Manmasiddaya-Chodamahirája mentioned above. Perhaps he took refuge at Pentrála in the Kandukur taluka before he was reinstated by Ganapati. His opponents, Akkana and Bayyana, are, however, not mentioned in any of the Nellore inscriptions. It does not seem likely that the two abovementioned Telugu works call Manmaganda. gopala, Manmasiddha, and mistake Eudradeva-Maharaja for Ganapati.Page Navigation
1 ... 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362