Book Title: Indian Antiquary Vol 34 Author(s): Richard Carnac Temple Publisher: Swati PublicationsPage 89
________________ APRIL, 1905.) WHITE HUNS AND KINDRED TRIBES. Toramana is named in the Gwalior inscription as father and predecessor of Mihirakula. An inscription which we possess of the former, puts the beginning of his supremacy over Central India at some time about the year 484. This fact, taken together with other data, brings as to the conclusion that the White Huns must have appeared in the North-West Frontier regions of India some time previously, probably towards the middle of the fifth century. Thus the period during which they figure in India, so far as it can at present be fixed, must very nearly correspond to that which oar Western authorities make us assiga to the Central-Asian dominion of the Ephthalites (ciro. 427--557 A. D.). Before passing on to discuss the nationality of the White Huns in India, we may devote some few words to the coins struck by the chieftains of this people. They supplement the know ledge we have won of their dominion with some facts of interest. On a great number of Mihirakula's coins we find the king's name preceded by the title Sähi, which was borne by Kanishka and his successors, and the origin of which we have already had occasion to discuss. This fact makes it likely that the Hun king wished to appear as the rightful successor of those monarchs. On the reverse of the coins generally appears the figure of the Nandi bull, the holy animal of Siva. The accompanying legend (jayatu vrsha) shows us that Mihirakula himself was attached to the Siva cult then prevailing amongst his native Indian subjects. We frequently meet with the king's name in the form Mihiragula, and it is probable that this represents the true pronunciation much more closely than the obviously Sanskritised form Mihirakula.20 "Toramāņa's coins have come down to us in equally large numbers, especially in Kashmir, showing that that kingdom had already been absorbed into the White Hans' dominion before Mihirakula's time. These coins acquaint us besides with the names of several other rulers, whose dates, etc., we are as yet unable to fix, but of whom it is very likely that they belonged to the race of the White Huns.21 Although the irruption of the White Huns and their hundred years of dominion, when viewed with regard to the facts noted below, appear only as an episode in the history of the Indian Frontier during the period under discussion, yet it is very important that we should form a clear notion as to the ethnic character of this conquering nation. In my opinion we now have sufficient data to solve this question. In the first place we must allow full weight to our Chinese authorities, which, on the one hand, distinctly call the Yo-tha a branch of the great Yue-chi, and on the other constantly insist on the striking resemblance in manners and customs between them and the Tu-kine or Turks. This observation is all the more important because the Chinese Annalists knew quite well that it was the Turks who destroyed the Central-Asian power of the Ephthalites in the middle of the sixth century. There can thus be no question whatever of the Chinese ever having confused the two peoples. But we have also a very useful guide in the name Hun" itself, as applied to the Ephthalites. In judging of this designation, I do not think enough attention has been paid to the fact that it is confirmed by three entirely independent sources. Of the Byzantine historians it might possibly be supposed at a stretch that they, having the European Hans in their mind, employed the name in a parely generic sense and without any real ethnological ground. Yet even in their case it ought to be remembered that Procopius, the first of them to use the term White Hun,' 'lived fully a hundred years after the time of Attila's Huns. But how are we to explain the regular use of the Sanskrit term Hüpa to designate this people, if not on the ground that the name became familiar there just in consequence of the White Hun inroad? 2. The name Gollas found in Kosmas Indicopleustes probably preserves the last half of the namo Mihiragula. Mihira is the appellation of the Iranian sun-god; gula is at any rate not a name of Indian origin. It is likely that we must seek for an explanation among the Turkish languages. 21 Among these names of princes there are two, Lahkhana and Khinkhila, which we meet with in the series of angient Kashmir rulors mentioned in the Rajatarangini, see my notes on Rajat. I. 347; III. 388. In General Cunningham's publioation, The Later Indo-Scythians, pp. 85 -99., much information is collected concerning the coins of the White Hun rulere of India, but it can only be used with critical caution. 12 See Specht, Études sur l'Asie Centrale, p. 345.Page Navigation
1 ... 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548