Book Title: Indian Antiquary Vol 34
Author(s): Richard Carnac Temple
Publisher: Swati Publications

Previous | Next

Page 249
________________ OTOBER, 1905.) THE COPPER AGE AND BRONZE IMPLEMENTS IN INDIA. 229 THE COPPER AGE AND PREHISTORIC BRONZE IMPLEMENTS OF INDIA. BY VINCENT A. SMITH, M.A., 1.0.8. (BETD.). (With a Map, five Plates, and four Woodouts.) PART I. The Copper Age. INDIA had no Bronse Age; that is to say, she never passed through a stage of civilization 1 marked by the general employment of bronze, an alloy of copper and tin, for the manufacture of such implements and weapons as have been made ordinarily of iron or steel since the beginning of the present Iron Age. India had her Stone Age; the Neolithio Period of which is clearly commemorated by a multitude of celts, hammer-stones, and the like, bearing a general and close resemblance to objects of the same kinds found in Europe and other parts of the world. The earlier Paleolithio Perlod, the existence of which in Europe is demonstrated by the abandant relics discovered in the river-drifts and bone-caves, is not well marked in India, and has not been proved except in the south, where it seems to have been separated from the Neolithic Period by a wide interval. In Southern India the Neolithio Period, during which every-day tools and weapons were made of stone, highly finished, and often finely polished, passed directly into the Iron Age; or in other words, the people who were in the habit of using stone axes and arrow-heads adopted iron instead as soon as it became available. The older elements of the existing Indian peoples, both in the north and south, apparently are the lineal descendants of the tribes who used stone implements and weapons of the Neolithic type. Bronse, which in most parts of Europe, and many regions of Asia and Africa, served to bridge over the transition from stone to iron, was either unknown, or very rarely used, in prehistorio India. The namerous bronze objects found in the megalithic tombs of the south are prehistoric only in the sense that the history of the times when they were made has not been preserved; but most of them are not of very remote date, and may be referred to the early centuries of the Christian era. They are contemporary, not with the relics of the Bronze Age in England, which date from about 1800 to 500 B. C., but with the remains of Roman and Saxon times. These comparatively modern bronze objects from the cometeries of Southern India were made for purposes of luxury or ornament, and never include ordinary tools or weapons. They are of no significance as landmarks in the attempt to trace the evolution of civilization in really ancient prehistoric times, as indicated by successive stages attained in the knowledge of metallurgic arts. The southern bronzes, therefore, will not be mentioned again in this essay, which is devoted to the study of the earliest metallic inventions which in India took the place of the stone material used during the Neolithio Period.1 A few specimens of Indian bronse, which may properly be termed prehistoric, as dating baok, perhaps, to 2000 B. O., are known; but are of great rarity, numbering no more than six, so far as I am aware. These excessively rare objects, which will be discussed in the concluding section of this essay, are not sufficient to establish the existence in India, as in Europe, of a Bronze Age, intervening between the Neolithic Period and the Iron Age. Reasons will be given for believing that they were either imported, or produced in some casual manner, which does not imply a knowledge of the utility of bronze for everyday domestio and warlike purposes. In the South, as already observed, iron, when bronght within the reach of the natives, probably through the agency of foreigners, was quickly appreciated, and substituted for the various kinds of stone previously in uso, just as it has been substituted in oceanic islands during recent years. The South Was isolated from overland communications with Northern India and the rest of the world by a broad and nearly impenetrable barrier of hilly jungle, and in early times I Soo M. R. Braoo Poon's Catalogue of the Prehistorie Antiquities, Government warm, Madras (Madrat Government Proue, 1901). The date assigned in the text to the southern bronsea is given on the authority of the label on the specimons in the British Yasemin

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548