Book Title: Epigraphia Indica Vol 12
Author(s): Sten Konow
Publisher: Archaeological Survey of India

Previous | Next

Page 69
________________ EPIGRAPHIA INDICA. [VOL. XII. No. 9.-BATIHAGARH STONE INSCRIPTION. SAMVAT 1385. BY RAI BAHADUR HIBA LAL, B.A., M.R.A.S., NAGPUR. This stone inscription is at present lying in the compound of the Deputy Commissioner's bungalow at Damoh, the headquarters of the district of the same name in the Central Provinces and situated on the Indian Midland Railway, 127 miles from Jabalpur, the direct distance by road being 66 miles. The stone was originally brought from Batihägarh, a village 21 miles north-west of Damoh and included in the Hattā tahsil. Batibăgarh was once the seat of Musalman governors sont from Delhi and there are ruins of a fort and other remains of its past greatness including inscriptions both in Sanskrit and in Persian. The one I edit is engraved on a slab 1'11" x 1'6" and is in a good state of preservation. The language is Sanskrit written in Nāgari characters, the average size of letters being ?". The writing covers a space of 1' 7"x1'. The whole record is in verge except the word Siddhill at the commencement and Subhan bhavatu at the end, together with the details of the date repeated in figures in line 14. There are altogether 15 verses in the 16 lines which the inscription contains. The only noticeable orthographical peculiarities are the indifferent use of s for $ as in line 7 where sastra- and -sästra- are written sastra- and -sõstra- respectively, and the employment of sh to do duty for kh in some places, for instance in line 8, where Khõja is written Shojā, and in line 14 where we find Vaisakha- as Vaisāíha.. This is however quite in keeping with the Bundēkhandi practice, which is even now followed by writers of the old school, who always express their kh by sh. In this inscription kh has also been expressed by its ordinary symbol, as in -khandan of the first line and lilēkha of the last. The letter i appears in its antiquated form in line 8. Note also the use of the akshara va with a dot underneath in order to denote va as distinguished from ba in bhauva-, 1. 1. This is quite in accordance with the ordinary Bundelkhandi practice, bat does not occur in other places in the inscription. The inscription records that a local Muhammadan ruler Jallála Khojā, son of Isaka, caused a Gomatha to be made in the town of Baţihādim, as also a garden and a stepwell. Jallala, i.e., Jalal-ud-din is stated to have been appointed as his representative by Hisämadim (Hisām-ud-din) also called Chhipaka, probably & corruption of Safiq, son of Malik Julachi. who was made commander of the Kharpara armies and governor of the Chēdi country by Sultan Mahmud. This Mahmäd is described as Sakēndra or lord of the Sakas, ruling from Yöginipura after having conquered other kings. The inscription further states that Jallala appointed his servant Dhanau as manager of the institutions named above, the principal architects whereof were Bhojāka, Kámadēva, and Hala of the Silapattal family. The composer of the inscription was the Kayastha Baijāka of the Mathura sub-division, and the writer another Mathura named Väsi, son of Sahadēva. The date is given in the 13th verse as Wednesday, the 3rd day of the bright fortnight of the Vaisakha month in the Vikrams year 1385. The year is expressed by symbolical words, and to make it clear, the substance of the verse is repeated in prose immediately afterwards, the year and the tithi being given in figures. The date regularly corresponds to Wednesday, the 13th April 1328 A.D. 1 silapatta is now known as the Silawat caste, who are masons and found in the neighbourhood of Damoh. * As calculated by Mr. Gokul Prasad Isvaradás, Tahsildar of Dhamtari. He remarks that the year in this case must be taken as Ashidhadi or Kärttikadi. If it is taken as Chaitradi the current Samvat would be 1886, and it would have to be supposed that the year given in the inscription was the expired year 1385. But as there in nothing in this inscription leading to this conclusion, the probability is that the year was Kärttikädi, taking into consideration the locality where the inscription was found.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464